Abstract.We have previously reported that star shaped poly(ethylene oxide-stat-propylene oxide) macromers with 80% EO content and isocyanate functional groups at the distal ends [NCO-sP(EO-stat-PO)] can be used to generate coatings that are non-adhesive but easily functionalized for specific cell adhesion. In the present study, we investigated whether the NCO-sP(EO-stat-PO) surfaces maintain peptide configuration-specific cell-surface interactions or if differences between dissimilar binding molecules are concealed by the coating. To this end, we have covalently immobilized both linear-RGD peptides (gRGDsc) and cyclic-RGD (RGDfK) peptides in such coatings. Subsequently, SaOS-2 or human multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) were seeded on these substrates. Cell adhesion, spreading and survival was observed for up to 30 days. The time span for cell adherence was not different on linear and cyclic RGD peptides, but was shorter in comparison to the unmodified glass surface. MSC proliferation on cyclic RGDfK modified coatings was 4 times higher than on films functionalized by linear gRGDsc sequences, underlining that the NCO-sP(EO-stat-PO) film preserves the configuration-specific biochemical peptide properties. Under basal conditions, MSC expressed osteogenic marker genes after 14 days on cyclic RGD peptides, but not on linear RGD peptides or the unmodified glass surfaces.Our results indicate specific effects of these adhesion peptides on MSC biology and show that this coating system is useful for selective testing of cellular interactions with adhesive ligands.
IntroductionThe surface design of biomaterials is a key element controlling their integration into the surrounding tissue and cell adhesion (1). The biomaterial surface modulates cellular responses in terms of adhesion, proliferation, inflammatory reactions and survival.Due to its surface properties an artificial implant usually induces the production of a fibrous tissue covering its surface after implantation. This fibrous layer reduces the tissueimplant contact, which may result in loosening of the implant or stimulation of further inflammatory processes. There are several strategies to enhance the ingrowth of non-biological materials by addressing non-specific cell-surface interactions. Alterations of the physical surface properties like hydrophobicity or surface topography are possibilities. For example, by creating nano-sized features on titanium-based surfaces the expression of bone sialoprotein (BSP) and osteopontin was stimulated by osteogenic cells (2). The enhancement of osteoblast adhesion and function on different nanostructured metal and ceramic materials was demonstrated in further studies (3,4).A more biomimetic strategy is to control adhesion, proliferation and differentiation of osteogenic cells by biochemical modification of the implant surface. While coating with hydroxyapatite is often used in combination with an alteration of surface roughness to improve osteointegration of implants (5), this approach does not minimize non-specific...