2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of power-to-gas in an integrated gas and electricity system in Great Britain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
116
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 264 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
116
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Barton and Gammon (2010) [43] UK; 2050; RE N/R Solar PV, solar thermal, tidal energy, wave energy, on/off-shore wind, biomass, waste, hydroelectricity H 2 for mobility, industry, power, gas grid injection and conversion to other fuels Process N/R; Capacities of 61.4 GW and 107.1 GW for "high renewable share" and "high nuclear share" scenarios, respectively N/A Jacobson et al (2011,(2013)(2014)(2015)(2016)(2017)(2018)) [44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51] California, New York, and Washington states, USA; All USA; World; 2050; 100% RE On/off-shore wind, hydropower, CSP, geothermal, solar PV, tidal, wave H 2 for ground, sea and air transportation; industrial and building heat generation Process and capacity N/R; 70% efficiency N/A Gutiérrez-Martín and Guerrero-Hernández (2012) [52] Spain; 2011-2020; 42% RE Wind, solar thermal, solar PV, hydroelectricity, nuclear H 2 for mobility or power (peak shaving) 53 nos. 50 [58] Spain; Timeline N/R; 31% RE Wind, solar thermal, solar PV, hydroelectricity, nuclear H 2 potentially for heating, power, synthetic fuel production or gas grid injection 300 nos 50 MW AEL (efficiency calculated) N/A Clegg and Mancarella (2015) [59] UK; 2030; 48% RE Wind H 2 and SNG for gas grid injection Process and capacity N/R; 73% efficiency Process N/R; 73% power-to-H 2 and 64% power-to-SNG efficiencies; CO 2 source N/R Qadrdan et al (2015) [60] UK; 2020; RE N/R Wind H 2 for gas grid injection Process N/R;~5-12 GW capacity; 70% efficiency N/A Ahern et al (2015) [61] Republic of Ireland; 2030; RE N/R Wind SNG for transport Process and capacity N/R; 75% efficiency Biological; 80% efficiency; 60% power-to-SNG efficiency; Anaerobic digestion biogas-derived CO 2 Vandewalle et al (2015) [62] Belgium; Timeline N/R; 69-76% RE (wo/w PtG)…”
Section: Regional To National-scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barton and Gammon (2010) [43] UK; 2050; RE N/R Solar PV, solar thermal, tidal energy, wave energy, on/off-shore wind, biomass, waste, hydroelectricity H 2 for mobility, industry, power, gas grid injection and conversion to other fuels Process N/R; Capacities of 61.4 GW and 107.1 GW for "high renewable share" and "high nuclear share" scenarios, respectively N/A Jacobson et al (2011,(2013)(2014)(2015)(2016)(2017)(2018)) [44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51] California, New York, and Washington states, USA; All USA; World; 2050; 100% RE On/off-shore wind, hydropower, CSP, geothermal, solar PV, tidal, wave H 2 for ground, sea and air transportation; industrial and building heat generation Process and capacity N/R; 70% efficiency N/A Gutiérrez-Martín and Guerrero-Hernández (2012) [52] Spain; 2011-2020; 42% RE Wind, solar thermal, solar PV, hydroelectricity, nuclear H 2 for mobility or power (peak shaving) 53 nos. 50 [58] Spain; Timeline N/R; 31% RE Wind, solar thermal, solar PV, hydroelectricity, nuclear H 2 potentially for heating, power, synthetic fuel production or gas grid injection 300 nos 50 MW AEL (efficiency calculated) N/A Clegg and Mancarella (2015) [59] UK; 2030; 48% RE Wind H 2 and SNG for gas grid injection Process and capacity N/R; 73% efficiency Process N/R; 73% power-to-H 2 and 64% power-to-SNG efficiencies; CO 2 source N/R Qadrdan et al (2015) [60] UK; 2020; RE N/R Wind H 2 for gas grid injection Process N/R;~5-12 GW capacity; 70% efficiency N/A Ahern et al (2015) [61] Republic of Ireland; 2030; RE N/R Wind SNG for transport Process and capacity N/R; 75% efficiency Biological; 80% efficiency; 60% power-to-SNG efficiency; Anaerobic digestion biogas-derived CO 2 Vandewalle et al (2015) [62] Belgium; Timeline N/R; 69-76% RE (wo/w PtG)…”
Section: Regional To National-scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, h G (*) can be calculated by (4), and the effect of the gas price on the dispatch of gas turbines is reflected in the model because the bidding curve is a factor in electricity network dispatching.…”
Section: Objective Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a traditional energy system, the interaction between a natural gas network and an electricity network can be implemented only via gas turbines. However, with the maturity of P2G technology [4][5][6], it becomes possible to achieve bidirectional energy flow between an electricity network and a natural gas network. Based on P2G technology, surplus electricity generated from renewable energy can be converted into natural gas or hydrogen that can be stored afterwards in the natural gas pipeline network or storage devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to describe behaviours of the whole system, both network and coupling unit models are required for simulating the system. As one of the main energy networks in urban areas, network analysis in steady states [6,19,20]. The dynamics of gas-fired generator and how they affect the interactions between the two networks are not well explored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%