2021
DOI: 10.21608/ejhm.2021.201985
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of Prostaglandin E2 in Cirrhotic Patients with Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

3
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding ascitic fluid PGE2, there is a substantial difference between the two cohorts, indicating that the greater the hospital mortality rate for diseased individuals with hepatic cirrhosis, the lower the ascitic fluid PGE2. In agreement with our findings, Aboghiaty et al (10) found no association between case cohort mortality, ascitic fluid, and serum PGDE2 before and after treatment. Additionally, MELD score and advanced age were independent predictors of death in multivariate analysis (34).…”
Section: Discussion Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Regarding ascitic fluid PGE2, there is a substantial difference between the two cohorts, indicating that the greater the hospital mortality rate for diseased individuals with hepatic cirrhosis, the lower the ascitic fluid PGE2. In agreement with our findings, Aboghiaty et al (10) found no association between case cohort mortality, ascitic fluid, and serum PGDE2 before and after treatment. Additionally, MELD score and advanced age were independent predictors of death in multivariate analysis (34).…”
Section: Discussion Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Additionally, there is a notable difference in terms of DM, which was higher in the non-SBP cohort. In line with our findings, Aboghiaty et al (10) found no statistically significant difference in the presence of hypertension between the examined cohorts. However, they disagreed with our findings because they discovered that DM was not related to SBP.…”
Section: Discussion Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation