2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2018.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of psychology in sociotechnical transitions studies: Review in relation to consumption and technology acceptance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
78
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
3
78
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite these ongoing advances, the sustainability transitions literature is critiqued for a seeming disconnection from the social sciences that have studied actors' behavior and behavioral change (Gazheli, Antal, & van den Bergh, ). As an example, there have been calls to examine individuals' psychosocial processes (Antadze & McGowan, ; Bögel & Upham, ; Gazheli et al, ). Moreover, the transitions literature adopts a seemingly static view of human behavior (Pesch, ; van der Vleuten, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite these ongoing advances, the sustainability transitions literature is critiqued for a seeming disconnection from the social sciences that have studied actors' behavior and behavioral change (Gazheli, Antal, & van den Bergh, ). As an example, there have been calls to examine individuals' psychosocial processes (Antadze & McGowan, ; Bögel & Upham, ; Gazheli et al, ). Moreover, the transitions literature adopts a seemingly static view of human behavior (Pesch, ; van der Vleuten, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the transitions literature adopts a seemingly static view of human behavior (Pesch, ; van der Vleuten, ). Leading researchers have recently called for the need to further our appreciation of actors in sustainability transitions (Bögel & Upham, ; de Haan & Rotmans, ; Gazheli et al, ; Upham et al, ; Upham, Lis, Riesch, & Stankiewicz, ; van der Vleuten, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This gap is similar to that previously identified in the transition studies field (e.g. Bögel and Upham, 2018;Hassink et al, 2018).…”
Section: Empirical Implicationssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Таким образом, индивидуальные характеристики скорее всего в меньшей степени определяют инновационную успешность. Творчество, креативность не обязательно порождают инновации и являются лишь одним из источников инноваций [9]. Отличительной особенностью группы успешной в выполнении задания являются характеристики групповых процессов, группового взаимодействия.…”
Section: результаты и их интерпретацияunclassified