2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2014.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of random thermal perturbations in the magmatic segmentation of mid-oceanic ridges: Insights from numerical simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Upwellings could result from Rayleigh-Taylor-type instabilities of a low-viscosity melt-rich region that underlies the ridge axis (Whitehead et al (1984); Schouten et al (1985); Kerr and Lister (1988); Parmentier 2018)) or from small-scale convection in the asthenosphere below the axis (Rabinowicz et al (1993); Sparks et al (1993); Rouzo et al (1995); Briais and Rabinowicz (2002)). Upwelling spacing could range from ∼20 km for melt channeling through a crystallizing porous media (Sarkar et al (2014); Mandal et al (2018)) to 100-300 km for asthenospheric convection (Parmentier and Phipps Morgan (1990); Rouzo et al (1995); Sparks et al (1993)). These estimates are, respectively, smaller and larger than the ∼55 km average ridge segment length observed on natural data (Carbotte et al (2015)) and predicted by our experimental scaling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upwellings could result from Rayleigh-Taylor-type instabilities of a low-viscosity melt-rich region that underlies the ridge axis (Whitehead et al (1984); Schouten et al (1985); Kerr and Lister (1988); Parmentier 2018)) or from small-scale convection in the asthenosphere below the axis (Rabinowicz et al (1993); Sparks et al (1993); Rouzo et al (1995); Briais and Rabinowicz (2002)). Upwelling spacing could range from ∼20 km for melt channeling through a crystallizing porous media (Sarkar et al (2014); Mandal et al (2018)) to 100-300 km for asthenospheric convection (Parmentier and Phipps Morgan (1990); Rouzo et al (1995); Sparks et al (1993)). These estimates are, respectively, smaller and larger than the ∼55 km average ridge segment length observed on natural data (Carbotte et al (2015)) and predicted by our experimental scaling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is now evident that melts start to localize in discrete zones during their ascent that eventually mediates for a heterogeneous magma supply to the ridge axes. Earlier numerical models [74,99] showed melt fraction as a function of spreading rates, suggesting that the melt fraction is substantially reduced from fast-to slow-spreading ridges. Secondly, the melt upwelling processes participate in solidification at the shallow level to form isolated mushy bodies, as reported by many earlier workers [107,108,111].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In submarine systems, the temperature calculated for the critical depth of partial melting cessation constrains the amount of available melt in the subcrustal MC system [80]. However, the melts ascend upward with a complex 3D pattern of their paths, determined by coupled convection-solidification processes [74,99,122]. The volume fraction of melt-crystal aggregates goes up [43,51]as subcrustal magma bodies form at mid-oceanic ridges.…”
Section: Mush Complex In Mor Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on earlier numerical model data and geophysical estimates, the three principal layers of the Tibetan lithosphere: upper/middle crust, lower crust, and mantle lithosphere are assigned varying densities and viscosities (Table 1). We consider a power-law decay function (Sarkar et al, 2014) to represent decreasing viscosities (μ) of model materials with temperature (T):…”
Section: Initial Conditions and Materials Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%