2019
DOI: 10.1128/aac.01746-18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of Rifampin against Staphylococcal Biofilm Infections In Vitro , in Animal Models, and in Orthopedic-Device-Related Infections

Abstract: Rifampin has been used as an agent in combination therapy in orthopedic device-related infections (ODRI) for almost three decades. The aim of this review is to provide data regarding the role of rifampin against biofilm infection in vitro, in animal models, and in clinical ODRI. Available data are gathered in order to present the rational use of rifampin combinations in patients with periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The role of rifampin is well defined in patients with PJI and is indicated in those who fu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
116
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
7
116
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, the superior efficacy of these two antibiotics is not related to their mechanisms of action, as rifampicin inhibits RNA polymerase (Campbell et al, 2001) and dalbavancin interferes with bacterial cell wall synthesis (Chen et al, 2007). Although rifampicin has been used in clinical practice against staphylococcal biofilm-related infections for almost three decades (Zimmerli and Sendi, 2019), this antibiotic should be administered carefully because of the danger of rapid emergence of rifampicin-resistant bacteria (Raad et al, 2007;Zhou et al, 2012). Thus, dalbavancin emerges as a promising solution in the fight against device-related infections, confirming the promising results obtained in animal models (Darouiche and Mansouri, 2005;Baldoni et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the superior efficacy of these two antibiotics is not related to their mechanisms of action, as rifampicin inhibits RNA polymerase (Campbell et al, 2001) and dalbavancin interferes with bacterial cell wall synthesis (Chen et al, 2007). Although rifampicin has been used in clinical practice against staphylococcal biofilm-related infections for almost three decades (Zimmerli and Sendi, 2019), this antibiotic should be administered carefully because of the danger of rapid emergence of rifampicin-resistant bacteria (Raad et al, 2007;Zhou et al, 2012). Thus, dalbavancin emerges as a promising solution in the fight against device-related infections, confirming the promising results obtained in animal models (Darouiche and Mansouri, 2005;Baldoni et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No significant side effects related to daptomycin were observed. Finally, the combination of daptomycin with rifampin, which has been linked to improved clearance of staphylococcal biofilm in multiple models of study 34 , should be the target of future formal clinical investigations to determine if a clinical effect on outcomes and prevention of emergence of resistance is observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radical debridement is the mainstay of treatment for all cases, but possible reasons for the improvement may be the modifications in surgical management and antimicrobial therapy that we have employed since then. We used systemic rifampicin in the majority (93.1 %) of cases for an average of 23.7 days [28]. Prior to the reimplantation of new components, the surgical field was also irrigated with a computed formulation of polyhexanide [29, 30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%