2018
DOI: 10.20546/ijcmas.2018.701.290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of Sepsis Screen Parameters in Early Diagnosis of Neonatal Septicemia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there are some screening tests (WBC, Platelets, Micro Erythrocyte sedimentation rate(ESR), Absolute Neutrophilic Count (ANC), C-Reactive Protein (CRP), (I/T) ratio, nitroblue teterazolium (NBT), serial Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and pro-calcitonin) that could predict sepsis within 6 to 8 hours 7. The ANC(<1000/ul) and the I/T ratio(≥ 0.2)give the clue about the early-onset sepsis in newborns 8. Rapid diagnostic tests like CRP, WBC indices may be used as a screening approach for early diagnosis and treatment of sepsis 9…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are some screening tests (WBC, Platelets, Micro Erythrocyte sedimentation rate(ESR), Absolute Neutrophilic Count (ANC), C-Reactive Protein (CRP), (I/T) ratio, nitroblue teterazolium (NBT), serial Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and pro-calcitonin) that could predict sepsis within 6 to 8 hours 7. The ANC(<1000/ul) and the I/T ratio(≥ 0.2)give the clue about the early-onset sepsis in newborns 8. Rapid diagnostic tests like CRP, WBC indices may be used as a screening approach for early diagnosis and treatment of sepsis 9…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also Monica et al (20) detected in their study that CRP is good diagnostic and therapeutic tool and it has high sensitivity and good protective value. On the other hand Markic et al (21) concluded that in spite that CRP are used in the laboratory evaluation of patients with suspected infection or sepsis, however it is still not always possible to accurately predict the presence of bacterial infection on the basic of clinical appearance and those laboratory tests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on their clinical symptoms and blood test results, we divided the newborns into two groups: those with unlikely sepsis and those with probable or proven sepsis. A positive blood culture result indicated proven sepsis, whereas a negative finding with clinical symptoms (e.g., ongoing temperature instability, shortness of breath, chest wall retraction, desaturation, or neurologic symptoms not explained by other conditions) or abnormal laboratory data findings (white blood cell count <5000/μL or white blood cell count 6 h after birth >32,000/μL, absolute neutrophil count <1000/μL, C-reactive protein >1 mg/dL, ratio of immature to total neutrophil count >20% [ 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ]) indicated probable sepsis. The rest of the newborns were included in the unlikely sepsis group.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%