PsycEXTRA Dataset 2012
DOI: 10.1037/e502412013-821
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of Serial Order in Auditory Distraction in Children and Adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Children are more susceptible to the effects of background speech on serial short‐term memory when compared with a silent condition (Elliott & Briganti, ). However, children seem to be no more susceptible than adults to the changing‐state effect (Elliott, Hughes, Macken, Briganti, & Kytola, ). Taken together, the differences in distractibility between children and young adults are generally very similar to the differences that have been found between adults with low and high WMC respectively (a greater susceptibility to distraction from attention capture in children and low‐WMC adults, but no relation between age and susceptibility to the changing‐state effect, just as with individual differences in WMC).…”
Section: Individual Differences In Distractibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Children are more susceptible to the effects of background speech on serial short‐term memory when compared with a silent condition (Elliott & Briganti, ). However, children seem to be no more susceptible than adults to the changing‐state effect (Elliott, Hughes, Macken, Briganti, & Kytola, ). Taken together, the differences in distractibility between children and young adults are generally very similar to the differences that have been found between adults with low and high WMC respectively (a greater susceptibility to distraction from attention capture in children and low‐WMC adults, but no relation between age and susceptibility to the changing‐state effect, just as with individual differences in WMC).…”
Section: Individual Differences In Distractibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%