Submarine Mass Movements and Their Consequences 2007
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6512-5_40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role Of Soil Behavior On The Initial Kinematics Of Tsunamigenic Slides

Abstract: Recent investigations on tsunami generation from submarine mass failures show that one of the most important factors influencing the source characteristics of the wave is the initial acceleration of the failure itself. In a number of these studies, a translational slide is modeled as a rigid body sliding down an inclined plane and basal resistance is neglected. In this paper, a similar rigid body model is proposed that incorporates basal resistance, which is related to the shear strength of the soil. Initial s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where γ = ratio of the bulk density of the sediment to the density of water, θ = slope angle, g = gravitational acceleration, B = slide length (for an equivalent semi-ellipse), C m = added mass coefficient, C n = Coulomb friction coefficient, For translational failures, Grilli and Watts (2005) and Watts et al (2005) assumed that C n was nearly zero, once motion was initiated, thus eliminating any role of soil behavior on the kinematics of the failed mass. Bradshaw et al (2007) extended Eq. 1 to include basal resistance as a function of s and B:…”
Section: Description Of Slide Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…where γ = ratio of the bulk density of the sediment to the density of water, θ = slope angle, g = gravitational acceleration, B = slide length (for an equivalent semi-ellipse), C m = added mass coefficient, C n = Coulomb friction coefficient, For translational failures, Grilli and Watts (2005) and Watts et al (2005) assumed that C n was nearly zero, once motion was initiated, thus eliminating any role of soil behavior on the kinematics of the failed mass. Bradshaw et al (2007) extended Eq. 1 to include basal resistance as a function of s and B:…”
Section: Description Of Slide Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the results of undrained ring shear testing by Stark and Contreras (1996) on normally consolidated Drammen clay, the undrained residual shear strength (S ur ) is defined by the following: Based on Stark and Contreras's ring test results, Bradshaw et al (2007) modeled the complete sediment strain softening behavior from peak to residual shear strength. However, given the small displacements (~ 2 cm) required to mobilize the residual strength in this sediment, it was thought that perhaps the strength behavior could be simplified to use a constant residual shear strength for all displacements.…”
Section: Description Of Slide Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation