2018
DOI: 10.1063/1.5032081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of Stone-Wales defects on the interfacial interactions among graphene, carbon nanotubes, and Nylon 6: A first-principles study

Abstract: We investigate computationally the role of Stone-Wales (SW) defects on the interfacial interactions among graphene, carbon nanotubes (CNTs), and Nylon 6 using density functional theory (DFT) and the empirical force-field. Our first-principles DFT calculations were performed using the Quantum ESPRESSO electronic structure code with the highly accurate van der Waals functional (vdW-DF2). Both pristine and SW-defected carbon nanomaterials were investigated. The computed results show that the presence of SW defect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
3
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The normalized interaction energies for both polymerized and unpolymerized PA6–CNT and PA6–G nanocomposites are shown in Figure . This figure shows that the PA6 matrix has a stronger attraction to the G reinforcement than the CNT reinforcement; this result matches well with density functional theory investigations in the literature . It is important to note that the presence of the terminating hydrogen atoms in the G sheets enhances the interaction energy between the PA6 matrix and the G reinforcement, but the enhancement is slight and does not account for the significantly stronger attraction of the G reinforcement to the PA6 matrix.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The normalized interaction energies for both polymerized and unpolymerized PA6–CNT and PA6–G nanocomposites are shown in Figure . This figure shows that the PA6 matrix has a stronger attraction to the G reinforcement than the CNT reinforcement; this result matches well with density functional theory investigations in the literature . It is important to note that the presence of the terminating hydrogen atoms in the G sheets enhances the interaction energy between the PA6 matrix and the G reinforcement, but the enhancement is slight and does not account for the significantly stronger attraction of the G reinforcement to the PA6 matrix.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This figure shows that the PA6 matrix has a stronger attraction to the G reinforcement than the CNT reinforcement; this result matches well with density functional theory investigations in the literature. 28 It is important to note that the presence of the terminating hydrogen atoms in the G sheets enhances the interaction energy between the PA6 matrix and the G reinforcement, but the enhancement is slight and does not account for the significantly stronger attraction of the G reinforcement to the PA6 matrix. The slight difference in interaction energy between the PA6 matrix and the G reinforcement with and without the influence of the hydrogen atoms is shown in Figure 5.…”
Section: ■ Theoretical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is contrary to the CDD isosurface presented here, where no overlapping of the isosurface between C-S-H with graphene-nanoribbon and SWCNT is visible. This charge redistribution is similar to weakly bonded nanocomposites discussed in the following papers [65][66][67].…”
Section: Electronic Redistributionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Another topological analysis is the ELF, which is crucial in determining the localization of bonds, electron pairs, and electronic redistribution regions [63,64]. It is, therefore, utilized in identifying chemical adsorption and studying the bonding character of nanocomposites [65,66]. The value of the ELF ranges from zero to unity, where ELF > 0.7 is defined as highly localized electrons such as core electrons, lone pairs, or bonding regions.…”
Section: Electronic Redistributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that the highest binding energy is strongest in Figure 1e, where the interface area of cellulose and polyaniline is maximized while establishing a hydrogen bond. These values of the binding energy here are comparable to other physically bonded systems with binding energy lower than 1 eV in magnitude per unit, such as cellulose -graphene oxide, polymer -graphene, polymer -SWCNT, polyanilinegraphene, and cellulose -biphenylene [27][28][29][30][31][32]. Table 1 summarizes the binding energy, interaction distance, charge transfer, and bandgap of the studied hybrid molecular configurations in Figure 1.…”
Section: H C O Nsupporting
confidence: 72%