2022
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.26190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of Supplemental Teriparatide Therapy to Augment Functional and Radiological Outcomes in Osteoporotic Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures in the Elderly Population

Abstract: With improved life expectancy and ever-increasing geriatric population with concomitant osteoporosis, there is increase in osteoporotic intertrochanteric hip fractures. Even the best surgical advances fail to provide satisfactory and early results. As a result, researchers' focus has lately shifted to developing a more integrated approach that combines the pharmacotherapeutic capabilities of teriparatide, a recombinant version of human parathyroid hormone (1-34), a new anabolic drug that enhances bone mass and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the heterogeneity I 2 value at 3 months was 71% (p=0.01), a sensitivity analysis was performed. After excluding one study 23 , the heterogeneity decreased significantly with I 2 value 34%, and it was 0% at 6 months. Subgroup analysis showed there were no significant difference in the fracture healing rate between the two groups at 3 months of treatment (RR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.90-1.18, p=0.64) and 6 months of treatment (RR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.95-1.05, p=0.97).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the heterogeneity I 2 value at 3 months was 71% (p=0.01), a sensitivity analysis was performed. After excluding one study 23 , the heterogeneity decreased significantly with I 2 value 34%, and it was 0% at 6 months. Subgroup analysis showed there were no significant difference in the fracture healing rate between the two groups at 3 months of treatment (RR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.90-1.18, p=0.64) and 6 months of treatment (RR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.95-1.05, p=0.97).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Also, 3(37.5%) RCTs used the random number table method 15-17, and 6(75%) RCTs used the random doubleblind grouping method [15][16][17][18][19][20] . Safety evaluation was reported in 7 studies [15][16][17][18][19]22,23 (Table 2). The risk of bias was noted (Figures 2-3), and the outcome measures were summarised (Table 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%