2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00703-015-0400-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of synoptic- and meso-scales on the evolution of the boundary-layer wind profile over a coastal region: the near-coast diurnal acceleration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
23
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The monthly average WRF-Chem wind direction shows an absolute bias of 1 • (October), 51 • (November) and 10 • (December) compared to the observed wind direction at Rotterdam airport. The error in November is large compared to previous findings (Jiménez et al, 2016), and this results in a large model-observation mismatch in tracer mixing ratios (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Model Skillcontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…The monthly average WRF-Chem wind direction shows an absolute bias of 1 • (October), 51 • (November) and 10 • (December) compared to the observed wind direction at Rotterdam airport. The error in November is large compared to previous findings (Jiménez et al, 2016), and this results in a large model-observation mismatch in tracer mixing ratios (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Model Skillcontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…The monthly average WRF-Chem wind direction shows an absolute bias of 1 (October), 51 (November) and 10 (December) degrees compared to the observed wind direction at Rotterdam airport. The error in November is large compared to previous findings (Jiménez et al, 2016) and this results in a large model-observation mismatch in tracer mixing ratios ( Fig. 3.3).…”
Section: Model Skillcontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…The parametrization schemes are based on a standard WRF model run that yields representative results in the Atacama Desert [33]. We followed the method proposed by Jiménez et al [34] to perform the WRF simulations: consecutive two-days WRF model runs initiated at 0 UTC were executed. The first day of simulation corresponded to the spin-up of the physical parametrization and the second day was used to represent the weather conditions of the study site.…”
Section: Design Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%