1992
DOI: 10.1002/eji.1830221206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of T cell subsets during the recall of immunologic memory to Leishmania major

Abstract: The contributions of different T cell subpopulations to the maintenance of immunity during secondary Leishmania major infections were analyzed in healed, resistant animals by depletion of T cell subsets in vivo. The strong delayed-type hypersensitivity mounted in immune genetically resistant mice upon challenge with viable promastigotes was mediated by both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Each T cell subpopulation alone contributes, although to a different extent, to the resolution of secondary lesions; both subsets, h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
43
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[21][22][23] These cells respond to recall antigens and can be detected in two ways: 1) by production of IFN-γ, 21 which can be assessed in vitro, and 2) by the LST, which shows an in vivo DTH reaction induced by intradermal injection of leishmanin. Although these reactions can be observed after curing of leishmaniasis when the host is generally immune, these responses do not always indicate protection because abundance of the Th2-type response in the presence of the Th1-response leads to persistent disease, as in the chronic non-healing form of CL or mucosal leishmaniasis, where IFN-γ and LST reactivities are high.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21][22][23] These cells respond to recall antigens and can be detected in two ways: 1) by production of IFN-γ, 21 which can be assessed in vitro, and 2) by the LST, which shows an in vivo DTH reaction induced by intradermal injection of leishmanin. Although these reactions can be observed after curing of leishmaniasis when the host is generally immune, these responses do not always indicate protection because abundance of the Th2-type response in the presence of the Th1-response leads to persistent disease, as in the chronic non-healing form of CL or mucosal leishmaniasis, where IFN-γ and LST reactivities are high.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biological consequence of these different abilities of DC subtypes to present MHC class I-bound Ags is currently not easy to define. Even though adaptive immunity against L. major parasites is mediated by CD4 ϩ Th1 cells, CD8 ϩ T cells are likely involved in promoting protection toward secondary infections (46). Furthermore, CD8…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, reconstitution of resistance in RAG Ϫ/Ϫ mice using T cells from naive C57BL/6 mice was optimal only when both CD4 ϩ and CD8 ϩ T cells were transferred. In the conventional high dose, s.c. infection model, a role for CD8 ϩ T cells in resistance to reinfection by L. major has already been established (12). CD8…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acquired resistance in this model has been shown to require CD4 ϩ T cells, activated in an IL-12-driven and CD40L-dependent manner, for the production of high levels of IFN-␥ that induce NO-dependent killing by infected macrophages (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10). Although CD8 ϩ T cells were shown to be essential to immunity to reinfection in resistant mice that healed their primary lesion (11)(12)(13)(14), the role of CD8 ϩ T cells in the control of primary infection remains unclear. A higher frequency of parasite-specific CD8 ϩ T cells was found in resistant (C57BL/6) compared with susceptible (BALB/c) mice (2,11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%