2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10086-004-0639-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of the gelatinous layer (G-layer) on the origin of the physical properties of the tension wood of Acer sieboldianum

Abstract: The tension wood (TW) properties of a 70 year-old Acer sieboldianum Miq were analyzed by using the G-fiber model which was proposed in our previous paper. The roles of the G-layer on the origins of (1) a high large tensile growth stress, (2) a large longitudinal Young's modulus, and (3) a high longitudinal drying shrinkage in the tension wood xylem were discussed on the basis of the simulations using the G-fiber model. The results suggest that the G-layer generates a high tensile stress in the longitudinal dir… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
24
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, a higher tensile stress in the G-layer compared with adjacent layers is most likely responsible for the contraction of the G-layer observed on longitudinal sections of poplar and beech (Fagus species) tension wood with light microscopy (Clair et al, 2005) and on transverse sections using atomic force microscopy (Clair and Thibaut, 2001). Likewise, a positive correlation between the released strain of maturation stress and the amount of G-layer in the tissue has been reported for several different wood materials (Clair et al, 2003;Yamamoto et al, 2005;Fang et al, 2008). In addition, this study demonstrated that the inner part of the S2 layer of tension wood had a MFA close to that of the G-layer.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Indeed, a higher tensile stress in the G-layer compared with adjacent layers is most likely responsible for the contraction of the G-layer observed on longitudinal sections of poplar and beech (Fagus species) tension wood with light microscopy (Clair et al, 2005) and on transverse sections using atomic force microscopy (Clair and Thibaut, 2001). Likewise, a positive correlation between the released strain of maturation stress and the amount of G-layer in the tissue has been reported for several different wood materials (Clair et al, 2003;Yamamoto et al, 2005;Fang et al, 2008). In addition, this study demonstrated that the inner part of the S2 layer of tension wood had a MFA close to that of the G-layer.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…On the other hand, the absolute value of L strain is small in the lower half side of the stem, where no G-fiber was formed. Similar observations have been made by several authors [45][46][47][48][49]. They suggest that the particular features of G-layer produce a high tensile stress in its axial direction, causing the large tensile L stress of tension wood.…”
Section: Gelatinous Fiber In Tension Woodsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This unified theory also accounts for the generation of very high tensile L stress in G-fiber [49,51,87]. The unified hypothesis was a consistent theory that explained the growth stress generation not only in normal wood but also in compression wood or tension wood.…”
Section: The Unified Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 69%
“…There is no bifurcation on the higher L shrinkage of tension wood than that of normal wood [12,19,28,56,60]. This was further confirmed in this study by the significant positive correlation between L shrinkage and GSI value (Fig.…”
Section: Growth Stress/physico-mechanical Propertiessupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This could be explained by the difference in microfibrillar angle between S 2 and G-layers, as has been observed and modelled for softwoods [32,49], but also by differences in chemical composition or other structural features. A comprehensive model relating the macroscopic behaviour in the L direction to the parameters of cell wall composition (e.g., [60]) would be required to analyse these relationships more deeply.…”
Section: Growth Stress/physico-mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%