Objective: To examine whether the association between clinical Alzheimer disease (AD) diagnosis and neuropathology and the precision by which neuropathology differentiates people with clinical AD from those with normal cognition varies by age.
Methods:We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 2,014 older adults (Ն70 years at death) from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center database with clinical diagnosis of normal cognition (made Յ1 year before death, n ϭ 419) or AD (at Ն65 years, n ϭ 1,595) and a postmortem neuropathologic examination evaluating AD pathology (neurofibrillary tangles, neuritic plaques) and non-AD pathology (diffuse plaques, amyloid angiopathy, Lewy bodies, macrovascular disease, microvascular disease). We used adjusted logistic regression to analyze the relationship between clinical AD diagnosis and neuropathologic features, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (c statistic) to evaluate how precisely neuropathology differentiates between cognitive diagnoses, and an interaction to identify effect modification by age group.
Results:
Conclusion:Clinical AD diagnosis was more weakly associated with neurofibrillary tangles among the oldest old compared to younger age groups, possibly due to less accurate clinical diagnosis, better neurocompensation, or unaccounted pathology among the oldest old. Neurology Age is arguably the strongest risk factor for dementia.1 Those 85 years or older, referred to as the oldest old, accounted for less than 1% of the population in 1996 but comprised approximately 40% of dementia cases.2,3 Despite high prevalence of dementia among the oldest old, cognitive impairment in this age group is not well characterized by symptoms or neuropathology, 4 with relatively few neuropathologic studies of Alzheimer disease (AD) in the oldest old. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] Preliminary studies that compared the strength of association between dementia diagnosis or cognitive performance and AD neuropathology (neuritic plaques and neurofibrillary tangles) between the young old and the oldest old suggest that the association is weaker among the oldest old 6,13 ; however, these studies were limited by small to moderate size and considered