1967
DOI: 10.3758/bf03327869
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of the optic tectum and general cortex in reptilian vision

Abstract: Optokinetic performance was measured in two groups of red-eared turtles; nex t, one group received bilateral ablation of the general cortex and the other received bilateral ablation of the optic tectum. After recovery, optokinetic performance was measured again. Cortical ablation had no effect, whereas tectal ablation brought about a deficit in responding in a 19stripe, but not in a 4-stripe drum. These results support the traditional view that the optic tectum is a major visual center in reptiles.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1969
1969
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Neither cortical nor tectal ablations alone affected the frequence of optokinetic nystagmus (OKN), whereas combined lesions of cortex and tectum led to a significant reduction in this type of eye movement. The absence of cortical lesion effects on OKR was confirmed in a subsequent study (Hayes and Hertzler, 1967), leading these investigators to conclude that the dorsal cortex "is not of particular functional importance" (Hertzler, 1972), at least in the kinds of visual discrimination capabilities they tested. They point out, however, that the cortex may play some role in visual behavior since combined cortical-tectal lesions produced more severe deficits than did tectallesions alone.…”
Section: Ablation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Neither cortical nor tectal ablations alone affected the frequence of optokinetic nystagmus (OKN), whereas combined lesions of cortex and tectum led to a significant reduction in this type of eye movement. The absence of cortical lesion effects on OKR was confirmed in a subsequent study (Hayes and Hertzler, 1967), leading these investigators to conclude that the dorsal cortex "is not of particular functional importance" (Hertzler, 1972), at least in the kinds of visual discrimination capabilities they tested. They point out, however, that the cortex may play some role in visual behavior since combined cortical-tectal lesions produced more severe deficits than did tectallesions alone.…”
Section: Ablation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…It appears that destruction of this tissue does not impair the ability to learn or remember simple spatial (Morlock, 1972;Peterson, this chapter) or visual problems (Bass et al, 1973;Peterson, this chapter). Neither is dorsal cortex necessary for discrimination of color (Diebschlag, 1938) or brightness (Peterson, this chapter), for normal optokinetic or visual cliff behavior (Hertzler and Hayes, 1967;Hayes and Hertzler, 1967), or for certain types of pattern vision (Bass et al, 1973).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations