2015
DOI: 10.1109/lgrs.2015.2409885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of the Orbital Tube in Interferometric Spaceborne SAR Missions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, not only the accuracy of the synchronization at the beginning of the datatakes is relevant, the size of the orbital tube in the radial dimension affects synchronization during the datatake, i.e., Δt acq varies during the acquisition. This effect has been addressed in [22] in the frame of the S-1 mission.…”
Section: B Burst Synchronization Aspects For Interferometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, not only the accuracy of the synchronization at the beginning of the datatakes is relevant, the size of the orbital tube in the radial dimension affects synchronization during the datatake, i.e., Δt acq varies during the acquisition. This effect has been addressed in [22] in the frame of the S-1 mission.…”
Section: B Burst Synchronization Aspects For Interferometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This state-of-the-art procedure is precisely described in [28] and not detailed here. There are however some interesting aspects to consider regarding the accuracy of the external DEM for the geometric azimuth coregistration in case of squinted acquisitions, which are covered in [22].…”
Section: Coregistrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current spaceborne missions like TerraSAR-X and Sentinel-1 achieve accuracies in the order of 5 ms or better in the burst synchronization, which would lead to a spectral decorrelation of 0.4 Hz for the suggested L-band system, hence having a negligible impact. It should be pointed out that, as discussed in [35], Δ actually varies across the acquisition, according to the properties of the orbital tube. Though this effect is not relevant for a Sentinel-1-like configuration it should be kept in mind, especially for larger orbital tubes and higher frequencies.…”
Section: ) Spectral Decorrelation Due To Burst (Cycle) Synchronizationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…where = − =− 570 Hz/s for the parameters of TABLE I (at far range). This implies the same synchronization requirement of a ScanSAR acquisition, which is a bit more stringent than in TOPS [35], but which in any case does not pose a challenge. Current spaceborne missions like TerraSAR-X and Sentinel-1 achieve accuracies in the order of 5 ms or better in the burst synchronization, which would lead to a spectral decorrelation of 0.4 Hz for the suggested L-band system, hence having a negligible impact.…”
Section: ) Spectral Decorrelation Due To Burst (Cycle) Synchronizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to achieve such a stringent coregistration requirement we propose to use a geometric coregistration approach based on an external DEM and accurate orbit information. The required DEM accuracy will depend on the magnitude of the crossing orbit angle between image pairs, which depends on the selected orbital tube [9]. For the STEREOID mission, current available DEMs, e.g., SRTM or TanDEM-X, suffice to meet the required coregistration accuracy.…”
Section: Insar Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%