2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcdt.2012.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of the QuantiFERON-TB gold in tube in ruling out tuberculosis in end stage renal disease patients receiving hemodialysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our data revealed that 9.7% of HD patients had indeterminate results, which is in agreement with the wide percentage range (2% to 40%) reported in previous studies [36,47,60]. For example, 30% of HD patients had indeterminate QFT-GIT results in Egypt [60].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our data revealed that 9.7% of HD patients had indeterminate results, which is in agreement with the wide percentage range (2% to 40%) reported in previous studies [36,47,60]. For example, 30% of HD patients had indeterminate QFT-GIT results in Egypt [60].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our data revealed that 9.7% of HD patients had indeterminate results, which is in agreement with the wide percentage range (2% to 40%) reported in previous studies [36,47,60]. For example, 30% of HD patients had indeterminate QFT-GIT results in Egypt [60]. In contrast, another study using the same diagnostic method showed that only 5.9% of HD patients had indeterminate results [55].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…On the basis of the present review, TST revealed higher pooled specificity (90.2%) but lower sensitivity (37.8%) among RF patients when compared to QFT-GIT in Saudi Arabia, with pooled specificity of 70.5% and sensitivity of 62.4% for the latter diagnostic tool ( Table 2). Superior specificity of QFT-GIT has been previously reported elsewhere which comes in agreement with its narrow immunological target compared to TST [31,55]. Again, it is worth remembering that despite the variability in sensitivity and specificity values of both tests in these different settings, these values have no particular meaning in assessing the overall accuracy due to the absence of gold standard diagnostic test to compare them with.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%