1983
DOI: 10.1128/jb.153.2.1072-1074.1983
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of the sfiA-dependent cell division regulation system in Escherichia coli

Abstract: Several authors have suggested that the SOS-associated (sfiA-dependent) system of division inhibition, normally induced by perturbations of DNA replication, also regulates steady-state (unperturbed) cell division. The present work shows that mean cell mass is identical in sfiA+ and sfiA mutant cultures during steady-state growth, that mass adjustment is identical after shift up, that sfiA expression is not induced by shift up, and that a sfiA mutation does not cause aberrant chromosome segregation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1983
1983
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cell division, on the other hand, is tightly regulated, even during unperturbed growth. We have investigated possible roles of the sfiA+ function in normal division regulation and have shown in particular that it is not involved in determining cell mass at different growth rates, mass adjustment after a nutritional shift-up, and chromosome segregation during steady-state growth (23). The strains used in these studies were genetically sfiC (unpublished data), so the processes studied must be sfiC-independent as well.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cell division, on the other hand, is tightly regulated, even during unperturbed growth. We have investigated possible roles of the sfiA+ function in normal division regulation and have shown in particular that it is not involved in determining cell mass at different growth rates, mass adjustment after a nutritional shift-up, and chromosome segregation during steady-state growth (23). The strains used in these studies were genetically sfiC (unpublished data), so the processes studied must be sfiC-independent as well.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%