2019
DOI: 10.1063/1.5117811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of the symmetry energy on the structure of neutron stars with unified equations of state

Abstract: The role of the symmetry energy on the internal constitution and the global structure of a cold nonaccreted neutron star is studied using a set of unified equations of state. Based on the nuclear energy-density functional theory, these equations of state provide a thermodynamically consistent treatment of all regions of the star and were calculated using the four different Brussels-Montreal functionals BSk22, BSk24, BSk25 and BSk26. Our predictions are compared to various constraints inferred from astrophysica… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More specifically, (1) and (2) were from Malik et al [64] and (3), (4), and (5) from Biswas et al [65]. The rest were from (6) Zimmerman et al [88], (7) Tsang et al [66], (8) Xie and Li [67], (9) Baillot d'Etivaux et al [68], (10) Malik et al [69], (11) Lim and Holt [71], (12) Chamel et al [75], (13) Raithel and Özel [79], (14) Carson et al [89], (15) Yue et al [80], and (16) Essick et al [81]. The average of these 16 new analyses was about K sym ≈ −107 ± 88 MeV at a 68% confidence level.…”
Section: Updated Systematics Of Symmetry Energy Parameters At ρ 0 After Incorporating the Results Of Recent Analyses Of Neutron Star Obsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, (1) and (2) were from Malik et al [64] and (3), (4), and (5) from Biswas et al [65]. The rest were from (6) Zimmerman et al [88], (7) Tsang et al [66], (8) Xie and Li [67], (9) Baillot d'Etivaux et al [68], (10) Malik et al [69], (11) Lim and Holt [71], (12) Chamel et al [75], (13) Raithel and Özel [79], (14) Carson et al [89], (15) Yue et al [80], and (16) Essick et al [81]. The average of these 16 new analyses was about K sym ≈ −107 ± 88 MeV at a 68% confidence level.…”
Section: Updated Systematics Of Symmetry Energy Parameters At ρ 0 After Incorporating the Results Of Recent Analyses Of Neutron Star Obsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that the compressibility of nuclear matter dominates the stiffness of neutron star matter therefore significantly contributes to the determination of the maximum neutron star mass M max . On the contrary, the symmetry energy has a greater influence on the determination of the neutron star radius R [63][64][65] rather than on M max . For our analysis we have used as observational inputs for our Bayesian study the multi-messenger astronomy measurements: mass measurements of PSR J0740+6620 [5] and PSR J0348+0432 [6], tidal deformability data from GW170817 [7,8], M max boundaries [9], and combined mass-radius measurements for PSR J0030+0451 [10,11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is the relative fraction of the proton and neutron degrees of freedom. Its value is fitted as it is described for example in reference [12], but as we pointed out in our work [1] the value of the symmetry energy plays negligible role for maximal mass stars as it is well known from references [3][4][5][6].…”
Section: The Model and The Equation Of Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applying our phenomenological linear formulae we could determine precisely the Landau effective mass value, m L ≈ 780 MeV, which was consistent with our preliminary Bayesian analysis in reference [2] as well. Here we investigate the subsequent a e-mail: barnafoldi.gergely@wigner.hu parameter in the above order, the compressibility K, which certainly has less impact on the maximal mass, than the radius, R [3][4][5][6]. Using our linear fits we present the parameter domain structure, while taking mass observation data from PSR J0740+6620 [7], PSR J0348+0432 [8], and PSR J1614−2230 [9], we estimate the mean K value including the uncertainties originating from both the theory and the data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%