2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of topography, canopy structure, and floristics in nest-site selection and nesting success of canopy songbirds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
1
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Controlling for the landscape context with a block design in different state forests, nesting success of canopy songbirds did not differ between shelterwood and unharvested stands. Similar numbers of diurnal avian predators in both stand types, which were directly documented as nest predators in our system (Newell and Rodewald 2011), could explain absence of any effect of shelterwood harvesting on nest survival. Changes in the predator community in more fragmented landscapes can depress nesting success (Donovan et al 1997, Rodewald and Yahner 2001), although additive effects of partial harvesting to fragmentation appear limited (Eng et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Controlling for the landscape context with a block design in different state forests, nesting success of canopy songbirds did not differ between shelterwood and unharvested stands. Similar numbers of diurnal avian predators in both stand types, which were directly documented as nest predators in our system (Newell and Rodewald 2011), could explain absence of any effect of shelterwood harvesting on nest survival. Changes in the predator community in more fragmented landscapes can depress nesting success (Donovan et al 1997, Rodewald and Yahner 2001), although additive effects of partial harvesting to fragmentation appear limited (Eng et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Others have found similar limited or variable short‐term responses of canopy songbirds to partial harvesting (review in Newell 2010). Weak and variable responses suggest other factors such as topography, existing forest structure, or floristics may mediate the response of canopy songbirds to harvesting (Newell and Rodewald 2011). Further work is needed to examine more complex interactions of partial harvesting with other forest attributes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MacArthur et al, 1962;Rosenberg and Anthony 1992;Mills et al, 1993;Newell and Rodewald 2011). These woodpeckers in particular depend on the old growth characteristics of southeastern pine forests (Engstrom and Sanders, 1997), namely tall open canopies, which we were able to capture with lidar.…”
Section: Canopy Structure For Wildlife Habitatmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…During the breeding season, we also observed Cerulean Warblers provisioning young at nests in Ohio from 2007 to 2009 (Newell and Rodewald , ). We conducted 30‐min observations of nestling provisioning behavior (51 nests in 39 territories), focusing on the later nestling phase when adults were actively feeding young (>80% of nestlings observed were at least 4 days old based on estimated hatching dates).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…We observed foraging behavior from 27 April through 9 July at six sites in two state forests in Vinton and Jackson counties. Three sites had recently been partially harvested to ∼50% stocking (Newell and Rodewald , ). During the non‐breeding season, we studied Cerulean Warblers at six shade coffee farms on the western slopes of the Cordillera de Merida in the Venezuelan Andes (Bakermans et al , , Newell et al ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%