2016
DOI: 10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20163414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of trans-cerebellar diameter in estimating gestational age in second and third trimester of pregnancy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to present study, Uikey et al and Prasad and Likitha similar to present study found BPD and TCD to be better predictors of gestational age as compared to other fetal biometric parameters. 4,16 In present study, difference in estimated and actual gestational ages as estimated by TCD were more precise for third trimester >28 weeks as compared to those in 16-28 weeks of pregnancy, however, overall estimates strongly correlated with actual gestational age (r=0.984) and thus showed statistically no significant difference between actual and estimated age. Thus, for third trimester pregnancy, TCD was found to be a better predictor of gestational age in a pregnancy having combination of both normal as well as IUGR cases.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…Similar to present study, Uikey et al and Prasad and Likitha similar to present study found BPD and TCD to be better predictors of gestational age as compared to other fetal biometric parameters. 4,16 In present study, difference in estimated and actual gestational ages as estimated by TCD were more precise for third trimester >28 weeks as compared to those in 16-28 weeks of pregnancy, however, overall estimates strongly correlated with actual gestational age (r=0.984) and thus showed statistically no significant difference between actual and estimated age. Thus, for third trimester pregnancy, TCD was found to be a better predictor of gestational age in a pregnancy having combination of both normal as well as IUGR cases.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…Our results were also in agreement with Uikey et al 23 study which indicated the correlation of TCD with BPD was (r = 0.960), with HC (r = 0.979), with AC (r = 0.980) and with FL (r = 0.976). The same study revealed that trans-cerebellar diameter to be a precise measurement in the detection of gestational age during second and third trimester of pregnancy without being affected by abnormal fetal growth patterns.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…10 Uikey et al, and Prasad found BPD and TCD to be better predictors of GA as compared to other fetal biometric parameters. 11,12 Similar study by Dashottar S et al found difference in estimated and actual GA as estimated by TCD were more precise for third trimester >28 weeks as compared to 16 to 27 weeks of pregnancy, however, overall estimates strongly correlated with actual gestational age (r=0.984) and thus showed statistically no significant difference between actual and estimated GA thus this study also support that third trimester pregnancy ,TCD was a better predictor of GA in pregnancy having combination of both normal as well as IUGR cases. 13 Similar to present study, the role of TCD in prediction of accurate GA in normal as well as IUGR pregnancy has also been highlighted in several previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%