2012
DOI: 10.19030/jabr.v28i4.7054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role Of Underwriters In Restraining Earnings Management In Initial Public Offerings

Abstract: ABSTRACT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the reputable underwriters are able to select the highest quality IPO firms, a positive relationship between underwriter ranking and IPO long term performance is expected. Lee et al (2012) find support consistent with this hypothesis.…”
Section: Effect Of Earnings Management On Ipo Long-term Performancesupporting
confidence: 75%
“…If the reputable underwriters are able to select the highest quality IPO firms, a positive relationship between underwriter ranking and IPO long term performance is expected. Lee et al (2012) find support consistent with this hypothesis.…”
Section: Effect Of Earnings Management On Ipo Long-term Performancesupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Other interesting international results that could spark Canadian research include the findings by Ndubizu () that EM is more related to cross‐listing rather than the issuance of new equity capital; Venkataraman et al () who find no evidence that pre‐IPO accruals are opportunistically high, and who suggest that auditors may reduce IPO clients' discretion (while noting that TWR and TWW's use of accruals at the end of the first year subsequent to the IPO date is a noisy measure of EM, assessing better alternatives); Ball and Shivakumar () who find that U.K. IPO firms report more conservatively than non‐IPO firms (they also challenge the results of TWW); and Chang et al () who use performance‐adjusted discretionary accruals as their measure of EM and find that the negative relationship between discretionary accruals and post‐IPO performance is not significant for firms with prestigious underwriters; it is only significant of lower quality underwriter IPO firms (see also Lee, Xie, and Zhou, ; Chen, Lin, Chang, and Lin, for studies that examine the role of underwriters in restraining EM in IPOs).…”
Section: Earnings Management Around the Ipo Datementioning
confidence: 99%