2019
DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2019.1588346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Roles and work–family conflict: how role salience and gender come into play

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
27
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, working women still have to carry a greater responsibility in family roles (Biggs & Brough, 2005; Fernando & Cohen, 2011). But Erdogan et al (2019) have reported contradictory findings as women engaged in white-collar jobs in Turkey had experienced minimum levels of conflict when they had predominant work-role salience; the same was true for men with predominant family role salience. Thus, findings are still inconclusive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As a result, working women still have to carry a greater responsibility in family roles (Biggs & Brough, 2005; Fernando & Cohen, 2011). But Erdogan et al (2019) have reported contradictory findings as women engaged in white-collar jobs in Turkey had experienced minimum levels of conflict when they had predominant work-role salience; the same was true for men with predominant family role salience. Thus, findings are still inconclusive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Life-span theory (Super, 1980), identity theory (Stryker, 1968) and social role theory (Eagly, 1987) are the theoretical frameworks that have been used in role salience research (as cited in Greer, 2011). Many researchers have pointed out that life role salience is primarily overlooked in work–family investigations, even though it is an important area to consider (Abeysekera & Gahan, 2019; Bagger & Li, 2012; Biggs & Brough, 2005; Eby et al, 2005; Erdogan et al, 2019; Greer & Egan, 2012; Hartung & Rogers, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations