2014
DOI: 10.1039/c4mt00111g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Roles for root iron plaque in sequestration and uptake of heavy metals and metalloids in aquatic and wetland plants

Abstract: Toxic metal(loid) contamination of soil and sediment poses long term risk to soil and human health through plant-human or plant-animal-human food chain pathways. Iron plaque (IP) formation is frequent in aquatic and wetland plant species and is responsible for the sequestration of various metal(loids). The presence of IP may act as a buffer or barrier and may thus enhance or reduce the uptake of potentially phytotoxic metals and metalloids by plants. If IP acts as a barrier, then low IP producing macrophytes/a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
74
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
2
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In tolerant genotypes, excess iron is known to precipitate on roots, forming an iron plaque that acts as a barrier against iron while ensuring the utilization of essential nutrients by those plants (a process known as indirect iron toxicity). In contrast, an imbalance of nutrients has been observed in susceptible plants growing in soils with toxic levels of iron [48,57,58]. The critical concentration of iron toxicity symptoms varies from 10 to 500 mg/L depending on the nutrient status in the plants and the presence of the reduction products in the environment [51].…”
Section: Iron Toxicitymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In tolerant genotypes, excess iron is known to precipitate on roots, forming an iron plaque that acts as a barrier against iron while ensuring the utilization of essential nutrients by those plants (a process known as indirect iron toxicity). In contrast, an imbalance of nutrients has been observed in susceptible plants growing in soils with toxic levels of iron [48,57,58]. The critical concentration of iron toxicity symptoms varies from 10 to 500 mg/L depending on the nutrient status in the plants and the presence of the reduction products in the environment [51].…”
Section: Iron Toxicitymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…S5). Both S and SO 4 2− can be reduced to S 2− under flooding conditions, and Fe 3+ can be reduced to Fe 2+ , and high concentration of Fe 2+ in the nonrhizosphere can increase mass flow of Fe 2+ to the rhizosphere ), leading to iron plaque formation on the root surface by the oxidation of Fe 2+ (Tripathi et al 2014). However, the formation of iron plaque is prevented when excessive S supply resulted in the formation of large amount of S 2− under flooding conditions and S 2− may react with Fe 2+ forming FeS which can precipitate on the root surface, limiting Fe 2+ oxidation on the root surface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, GPX was more enhanced in tolerant rice, indicating a more prominent role in ROS detoxification in Triguna than IET-4786 ( Figure 6B). A significant portion of AsIII was changed to AsV in the rhizospheric region because of oxygen leakage during As stress to avoid anoxia [1,44]. Both AsV and AsIII were reported in various AsIIIexposed plant species [38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%