Roles of domain knowledge and working memory capacity in components of skill in Texas Hold’Em poker.

Abstract

Domain knowledge is a powerful predictor of success in many complex tasks, but do general cognitive abilities also play a role? To investigate this question, we had 155 participants representing a wide range of poker experience and skill complete tests of poker knowledge, working memory capacity (WMC), and two components of skill in Texas Hold'Em poker: the ability to remember hands and the ability to evaluate hands. Not surprisingly, poker knowledge positively predicted performance in all of the Hold'Em tasks. However, WMC added significantly to the prediction, and there was no evidence for interactions between poker knowledge and WMC. That is, WMC was as important as a predictor of performance at high levels of poker knowledge as at low levels, suggesting that domain knowledge may not always enable circumvention of WMC in domain-relevant tasks.

You can’t teach speed: sprinters falsify the deliberate practice model of expertise

“…Nonetheless, there is mounting evidence that much individual variation in achievement in more cognitive expertise domains (e.g., music, chess, educational attainment) also cannot be accounted for by the DPM (Hambrick & Meinz, 2011; Meinz et al, 2012; Meinz & Hambrick, 2010; Hambrick et al, 2013; Wai, 2014). …”

The Crucial Role of Working Memory in Intellectual Functioning

“…Thirdly, it has been shown that some modern child prodigies have a moderate level of intelligence but extremely high performance in WM (Ruthsatz & Urbach, 2012). Fourthly, WM predicts success in complex tasks such as Texas Hold'em (Meinz, Hambrick, Hawkins, Gillings, Meyer, & Schneider, 2011) or piano sight-reading skills (Meinz & Hambrick, 2011).…”

Naturalistic Assessment of Everyday Memory Performance Among Older Adults

“…In consequence, there are theoretical assumptions that acquired knowledge (expertise), strategies, and skills stored in LTM help to increase STM performance (Ericsson & Delaney, 1999). This was shown by a number of studies using the expert performance approach across a number of different domains such as piano playing (Meinz & Hambrick, 2010), piloting tasks (Morrow, Leirer, Altiteri, & Fitzsimmons, 1994), and Texas Hold'em poker (Meinz et al, 2012). In all of these studies, it was shown on younger adults that domain-specific knowledge and WM capacity are both relevant predictors for memory tasks.…”

“…As pointed, participants show a different performance on a memory task in a common environment compared with pure laboratory-based task (Hambrick & Oswald, 2005;Meinz & Hambrick, 2010;Meinz et al, 2012). However, those studies did not include the distraction of movements and high volume of visual-spatial information.…”