We recently identified a novel mechanism explaining how the mouse (m) prostacyclin receptor (IP) couples to G␣ s , G␣ i , and G␣ q (Lawler, O. A., Miggin, S. M., and Kinsella, B. T. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 33596 -33607) whereby mIP coupling to G␣ i and G␣ q is dependent on its initial coupling to G␣ s and subsequent phosphorylation by cAMP-dependent protein kinase A (PKA) on Ser 357 . In the current study, the generality of that mechanism was investigated by examining the G protein coupling specificity of the human (h) IP. The hIP efficiently coupled to G␣ s /adenylyl cyclase and to G␣ q /phospholipase C activation but failed to couple to G␣ i . Coupling of the hIP to G␣ q , or indeed to G␣ s or G␣ i , was unaffected by the PKA or protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitors H-89 and GF 109203X, respectively. Thus, mIP and hIP exhibit essential differences in their coupling to G␣ i and in their dependence on PKA in regulating their coupling to G␣ q . Analysis of their primary sequences revealed that the critical PKA phosphorylation site within the mIP, at Ser 357 , is replaced by a PKC site within the hIP, at Ser 328 . Conversion of the PKC site of the hIP to a PKA site generated hIP QL325,326RP that efficiently coupled to G␣ s and to G␣ i and G␣ q ; coupling of hIP QL325,326RP to G␣ i but not to G␣ s or G␣ q was inhibited by H-89. Abolition of the PKC site of the hIP generated hIP S328A that efficiently coupled to G␣ s and G␣ q but failed to couple to G␣ i . Finally, conversion of the PKA site at Ser 357 within the mIP to a PKC site generated mIP RP354,355QL that efficiently coupled to G␣ s but not to G␣ i or G␣ q . Collectively, our data highlight critical differences in signaling by the mIP and hIP that are regulated by their differential phosphorylation by PKA and PKC together with contextual sequence differences surrounding those sites.