2021
DOI: 10.1029/2020gl089455
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Roles of Shear and Convection in Driving Mixing in the Ocean

Abstract: Using field, numerical, and laboratory studies, we consider the roles of both shear and convection in driving mixing in the interior of the density‐stratified ocean. Shear mixing dominates when the Richardson number Ri < 0.25, convective mixing dominates when Ri > 1.0, and in the intermediate regime when 0.25 < Ri < 1.0 both shear and convection can contribute to mixing. For pure shear mixing the mixing efficiency Rif approaches 0.5, while for pure convective mixing the mixing efficiency Rif approaches 0.75. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The breaking of ISWs by plunging is anticipated to be dominated by convective instability, whilst ISW breaking by collapsing is anticipated to be shear dominated. Higher mixing efficiencies are anticipated for flows dominated by convection-driven mixing than shear-driven mixing (Ivey et al 2021), however, overall rates of mixing were much higher for the collapsing wave than the plunging wave, with approximately 14 % and 4 % of initial available energy going to irreversible mixing, respectively (despite comparable dissipation). To what extent the mixing is affected by variation of stratification, rather than by changing breaker type would be an interesting area of future study.…”
Section: Relevance At the Ocean Scalementioning
confidence: 96%
“…The breaking of ISWs by plunging is anticipated to be dominated by convective instability, whilst ISW breaking by collapsing is anticipated to be shear dominated. Higher mixing efficiencies are anticipated for flows dominated by convection-driven mixing than shear-driven mixing (Ivey et al 2021), however, overall rates of mixing were much higher for the collapsing wave than the plunging wave, with approximately 14 % and 4 % of initial available energy going to irreversible mixing, respectively (despite comparable dissipation). To what extent the mixing is affected by variation of stratification, rather than by changing breaker type would be an interesting area of future study.…”
Section: Relevance At the Ocean Scalementioning
confidence: 96%
“…We acknowledge that while our specific choice for the parametrization of (as per ) is rooted in physical reasoning and seems plausible based on a wide range of oceanic datasets (as discussed in MCA21), it is one of the existing paradigms. Alternative viewpoints, for example, have recently been expressed by Garanaik and Venayagamoorthy (2019) and Ivey, Bluteau, Gayen, Jones, and Sohail (2021) and can straightforwardly be implemented in our recipe.…”
Section: On the Sensitivity Of Our Results To Specific Choices Within...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Gargett's ratio raised to the 4/3 power has been referred to as the isotropy parameter (Thorpe 2007; Ivey, Winters & Koseff 2008) and as the buoyancy Reynolds number (Ivey et al. 2021; Mashayek et al. 2022).…”
Section: Nonlinear Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of the ratio of Ozmidov to Kolmogorov length scales L O /L K to characterize the bulk effect of stratification on turbulence can be traced to the isotropy parameter of Gargett, Osborn & Nasmyth (1984). More recently, Gargett's ratio raised to the 4/3 power has been referred to as the isotropy parameter I (Thorpe 2007;Ivey, Winters & Koseff 2008) and as the buoyancy Reynolds number Re b (Ivey et al 2021;Mashayek et al 2022). To avoid confusion, we refer to Gargett's ratio raised to the 4/3 power as the Ozmidov-Kolmogorov length-scale ratio.…”
Section: Barotropic Tide Dissipationmentioning
confidence: 99%