The glutathione transferases (GSTs) of plants are a superfamily of abundant enzymes whose roles in endogenous metabolism are largely unknown. For example, the lambda class of GSTs (GSTLs) have members that are selectively induced by chemical stress treatments and based on their enzyme chemistry are predicted to have roles in redox homeostasis. However, using conventional approaches these functions have yet to be determined. To address this, recombinant GSTLs from wheat and Arabidopsis were tagged with a Strep tag and after affinity-immobilization, incubated with extracts from Arabidopsis, tobacco, and wheat. Bound ligands were then recovered by solvent extraction and identified by mass spectrometry (MS). With the wheat enzyme TaGSTL1, the ligand profiles obtained with in vitro extracts from tobacco closely matched those observed after the protein had been expressed in planta, demonstrating that these associations were physiologically representative. The stress-inducible TaGSTL1 was found to selectively recognize flavonols (e.g. taxifolin; K d ؍ 25 nM), with this binding being dependent upon S-glutathionylation of an active site cysteine. In the case of the wheat extracts, this selectivity in ligand recognitions lead to the detection of flavonols that had not been previously described in this cereal. Subsequent in vitro assays showed that the co-binding of flavonols, such as quercetin, to the thiolated TaGSTL1 represented an intermediate step in the reduction of the respective S-glutathionylated quinone derivatives to yield free flavonols. These results suggest a novel role for GSTLs in maintaining the flavonoid pool under stress conditions.
The glutathione transferase (GST)2 superfamily of proteins in plants can be divided into seven groupings based on sequence similarity, namely the phi, tau, zeta, theta, dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR), lambda, and tetrachlorohydroquinone dehalogenase-like (TCHQD) classes (1). In the majority of cases, the endogenous roles of these proteins are unknown. Attempts to unravel the function of GSTs using reverse genetic approaches has only rarely proved successful (2), with even multiple knock-outs of related genes giving negligible perturbations in metabolic or physiological phenotype (3). The most plausible reason for this inability to disrupt phenotype is that at any given time, the expression of multiple GSTs with overlapping functions effectively masks the loss of function of individual members. Defining the roles for these abundant and stress responsive proteins using methods other than molecular genetics therefore represents a major challenge in functional genomics.Whereas disrupting the expression of plant GSTs normally gives no measurable perturbation in metabolite contents in planta (3), these proteins do have the ability to bind natural products with high affinity. For example, we have determined that members of the tau (U) class of GSTs bind porphyrin intermediates and fatty acids derived from bacteria and plants both in vitro and in vivo (4 -5). Whereas most of the...