1960
DOI: 10.1002/j.2164-4918.1960.tb02648.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Roles Played by Adolescents in an Unproductive Counseling Group

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1963
1963
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The opportunity for observation by the teacher and the compensation to the pupil of school credit were described. A methodological study was reported by Cohn, Ohlsen, and Proff (1960). Roles were defined that seemingly caused group counseling of underachieving students to be unproductive.…”
Section: Therapies Affecting Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The opportunity for observation by the teacher and the compensation to the pupil of school credit were described. A methodological study was reported by Cohn, Ohlsen, and Proff (1960). Roles were defined that seemingly caused group counseling of underachieving students to be unproductive.…”
Section: Therapies Affecting Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He must be flexible enough to make use of the many roles called for in the group situation. A listing of some of these roles, categorized generally as informative, positive, and negative, is described by Cohn, Ohlsen, and Proff [3].…”
Section: The Group Counselormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some instructors perceive a reduction in grading load as a group of four students will only produce one (often more complex) project (Goldfinch and Raeside, 1990; Tucker and Reynolds, 2006; Young and Henquinet, 2000), which should allow them to provide more thorough feedback to students. However, incorporating collaboration increases the level of complexity significantly and groups often experience various forms of dysfunction such as social loafing (De Vita, 2001; Freeman, 1995; King and Behnke, 2005; Zhang et al , 2008), inappropriate division of labour (Sheingold et al , 1984), groupthink (Haynes, 2012; Falchikov, 1995), or group domination (Cohn et al , 1960) to name a few (see Table I for more). These dysfunctions can serve not only to create discomfort for the students, but can also hinder the learning process (Webb, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%