“…Some instructors perceive a reduction in grading load as a group of four students will only produce one (often more complex) project (Goldfinch and Raeside, 1990; Tucker and Reynolds, 2006; Young and Henquinet, 2000), which should allow them to provide more thorough feedback to students. However, incorporating collaboration increases the level of complexity significantly and groups often experience various forms of dysfunction such as social loafing (De Vita, 2001; Freeman, 1995; King and Behnke, 2005; Zhang et al , 2008), inappropriate division of labour (Sheingold et al , 1984), groupthink (Haynes, 2012; Falchikov, 1995), or group domination (Cohn et al , 1960) to name a few (see Table I for more). These dysfunctions can serve not only to create discomfort for the students, but can also hinder the learning process (Webb, 1995).…”