2016
DOI: 10.1525/mp.2016.33.3.332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Roll Over Beethoven? An Initial Investigation of Listeners’ Perception of Chords Used in Rock Music

Abstract: Popular mainstream music (hereafter, rock) employs the basic set of chords built on the diatonic scale but also many others (de Clercq & Temperley, 2011; Stephenson, 2002). In an initial investigation of listeners’ perception of rock harmony, we adapted a rating task developed by Krumhansl (1990) in her pioneering studies of the common-practice harmonic hierarchy. Participants provided surprise and liking ratings for 35 (major, minor, dominant 7, and control) target chords that followed short key-establish… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Huron () proposed that correctly predicting what will happen next in a musical piece leads to a positive hedonic response, which he calls a “prediction effect”; incorrect predictions lead to a negative hedonic response. Consistent with this, predictable music is rated as more pleasant (Koelsch, Fritz, & Schlaug, ), more liked (Craton, Juergens, Michalak, & Poirier, ), and more positive and less arousing (Egermann, Pearce, Wiggins, & McAdams, ) than less predictable music. Other expectancy‐based affective responses that have been proposed but are largely untested include interest, anxiety, surprise, thrills/chills, hope, and disappointment (Huron & Margulis, ; Juslin, ).…”
Section: Scope and Goals Of The Articlementioning
confidence: 66%
“…Huron () proposed that correctly predicting what will happen next in a musical piece leads to a positive hedonic response, which he calls a “prediction effect”; incorrect predictions lead to a negative hedonic response. Consistent with this, predictable music is rated as more pleasant (Koelsch, Fritz, & Schlaug, ), more liked (Craton, Juergens, Michalak, & Poirier, ), and more positive and less arousing (Egermann, Pearce, Wiggins, & McAdams, ) than less predictable music. Other expectancy‐based affective responses that have been proposed but are largely untested include interest, anxiety, surprise, thrills/chills, hope, and disappointment (Huron & Margulis, ; Juslin, ).…”
Section: Scope and Goals Of The Articlementioning
confidence: 66%
“…Third, both experiments tested the effect of register on listeners’ ratings by presenting low and high register versions of a subset of target chords. Fourth, to provide a firmer basis comparing our results with previous chord rating studies, we replicated results from Craton et al (2016) using liking ratings (Experiment 1) and then obtained goodness of fitness ratings (Experiment 2) for the same stimuli.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The first experiment was a partial replication and extension of Craton et al (2016) with a much larger sample. As in the previous study, participants in the current experiment provided liking ratings (1 = dislike extremely ; 10 = like extremely ) for target chords that followed a short passage that established C as the tonal center (a C major scale + C tonic major triad).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations