2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2003.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Roll-over shapes of human locomotor systems: effects of walking speed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
157
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(167 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
8
157
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies measuring nondisabled persons' ROS used only sagittal plane marker data to construct the shank-based coordinate system. These previous calculations of ROS also transformed only the sagittal plane components of the COP of the GRF into this planar shank-based coordinate system [6]. The use of only sagittal plane data when studying nondisabled subjects seems justified since the majority of the movement is in this plane.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies measuring nondisabled persons' ROS used only sagittal plane marker data to construct the shank-based coordinate system. These previous calculations of ROS also transformed only the sagittal plane components of the COP of the GRF into this planar shank-based coordinate system [6]. The use of only sagittal plane data when studying nondisabled subjects seems justified since the majority of the movement is in this plane.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…She suggested that during the stance phase of nondisabled subjects, progression over the supporting foot is assisted by these three rockers. Roll-over shape (ROS) is defined as the effective geometry to which the ankle-foot complex conforms between initial contact and opposite initial contact [6] and represents the integrated effect of the ankle-foot rockers described by Perry [5] that occurs during the same period. Research has shown that the ankle-foot complex of nondisabled persons creates an effective ROS during normal gait that is essentially invariant to added weight to the torso, walking speed, and footwear [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In young nondisabled persons, the roll-over shape has been shown to conform to a rocker shape with a radius of about one-third of the leg length [23]. In addition, the radius of the roll-over shape stays consistent for level walking conditions, including walking at different speeds [24], while carrying added weights to the trunk [25], and while walking with different footwear [26], making it a useful tool for the development of prosthetic feet. The goal for the Shape&Roll Talon foot was therefore to mimic as closely as possible the physiological roll-over shape by using a In order to verify the intended functional properties of the Shape&Roll Talon, we tested the roll-over shape of a 7 cm HH prototype, with an overall foot size of 25 cm.…”
Section: Roll-over Shape Testing Of Prototypesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three trials were collected, and the resulting data were used to determine the Shape&Roll Talon's roll-over shape and corresponding radii as described in an earlier work [24].…”
Section: Roll-over Shape Testing Of Prototypesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Roll-over shapes vary little for people of similar leg lengths. The roll-over shape has been found to be invariant to walking speed [10], added weight [11], and shoe heel height [12]. Studies suggest that prosthetic feet with roll-over shapes similar to physiological roll-over shapes result in higher symmetry in loading between prosthetic and non-prosthetic sides [9] and higher metabolic efficiency while walking [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%