2020 International Conference on Sensing, Measurement &Amp; Data Analytics in the Era of Artificial Intelligence (ICSMD) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/icsmd50554.2020.9261687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rolling Bearing Fault Diagnosis Based on Horizontal Visibility Graph and Graph Neural Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to pure numerical information, the proposed method gives additional valuable information for classification. Li et al (2020a) prove that the GNN model outperforms the RNN model for bearing faults diagnosis.…”
Section: Graph Neural Network (Gnn)mentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared to pure numerical information, the proposed method gives additional valuable information for classification. Li et al (2020a) prove that the GNN model outperforms the RNN model for bearing faults diagnosis.…”
Section: Graph Neural Network (Gnn)mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…By aggregating information from the node's neighbors at any depth, GNN can more effectively extract and inference data relationships. Using a horizontal visibility graph (HVG) and a GNN, Li et al (2020a) suggested a new model for bearing faults diagnosis. The HVG algorithm turns a time series sample into a graph with condition-specific topology.…”
Section: Graph Neural Network (Gnn)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fault diagnosis applications, the interpretation of nodes and edges varies. For instance, Li et al [30] treated each data point in a sample as a node, using the data point's value as the node embedding and connecting nodes through HVG. Miao et al [10] considered signals from each sensor in a robot as nodes, with signal values as embeddings, and established connections based on kinematic equations.…”
Section: Graph Convolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further demonstrate the superiority of our proposed approach, we compared it with other state-of-the-art methods, as shown in table 3. The deep learning methods considered include GCN-based, GATbased, and GIN-based methods denoted as method 1 (GCN proposed in [15]), method 2 (GAT proposed in [31]), method 3 (HVG-GIN proposed in [35]), and method 4 (WHVG-GIN+ proposed in [34]). Notably, our approach achieved remarkable results, with accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score values reaching 100.00% across the entire test set.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%