2023
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6501/ad031b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rolling bearing fault diagnosis model based on DSCB-NFAM

Xiaoqiang Zhao,
Haike Guo

Abstract: Machine learning techniques have had great success in fault diagnosis. However, the traditional machine learning methods rely heavily on manual priori knowledge leading to poor fault diagnosis results in rolling bearing fault diagnosis. Deep learning techniques can improve the accuracy of fault intelligent diagnosis with the help of automatic extraction of fault features. In this article, a method of smart fault diagnosis for rolling bearings based on depth-separable convolutional block (DSCB)-non-local featur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The AEZSD method was compared with other state-of-the-art zero-shot diagnosis methods, as shown in table 5. For comparison with traditional supervised learning methods, we selected four methods: DSCB-NFAM [23], NI-CNN [24], CS-DCNN [25], and TBLS [26]. Since traditional methods are not designed for zero-shot fault diagnosis, we re-partitioned the dataset by randomly selecting 70% of each fault type's data for training and the remaining 30% for testing.…”
Section: Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AEZSD method was compared with other state-of-the-art zero-shot diagnosis methods, as shown in table 5. For comparison with traditional supervised learning methods, we selected four methods: DSCB-NFAM [23], NI-CNN [24], CS-DCNN [25], and TBLS [26]. Since traditional methods are not designed for zero-shot fault diagnosis, we re-partitioned the dataset by randomly selecting 70% of each fault type's data for training and the remaining 30% for testing.…”
Section: Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%