2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.12.068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rolling contact fatigue behavior of Ti/TiN coated ADI by cathodic arc deposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A total film thickness of about 1.2 µm was selected, while the TiAl layer thickness of the bilayer coatings was approximately 0.2 µm. According to previous studies [32,36], the combinations of temperature and time employed for each coating variant do not produce degradation of ADI microstructure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A total film thickness of about 1.2 µm was selected, while the TiAl layer thickness of the bilayer coatings was approximately 0.2 µm. According to previous studies [32,36], the combinations of temperature and time employed for each coating variant do not produce degradation of ADI microstructure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, the performance of Ti 1- x Al x N coatings depends strongly on their crystal structure which changes from cubic to hexagonal at an Al content x = 0.6 and causes a decrease in hardness and wear resistance [2730]. The authors of the present work compared the wear behaviour, under lubricated rolling contact conditions, of ADI coated with TiN and TiAlN films deposited by CAD and by PBIID [3133]. It was found that, under the deposition conditions used, TiN and TiAlN coatings grew with a cubic-NaCl type structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous works, the authors of this paper studied the RCF behavior of ADI samples coated with monolayer and bilayer films deposited by cathodic arc deposition (CAD) using industrial and experimental devices, respectively [1][2][3]. It was found that the resistance of the monolayer coated samples increases as coating hardness and thickness decrease.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%