27th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference 2009
DOI: 10.2514/6.2009-3937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rolling Moment Characteristics at High Alpha on Several Planforms of Cranked Arrow Wing Configuration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 for AOA ranging from -30 to +30 deg. The linearity of its lift coefficient is found to be good for this wide range of positive AOA, owing to the stability of the vortex system over the present cranked-arrow wing with a large inboard sweepback angle of 66deg 1) . The linearity deteriorates for negative AOA probably because the engine nacelles would interfere with the vortex system.…”
Section: Lift and Drag Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5 for AOA ranging from -30 to +30 deg. The linearity of its lift coefficient is found to be good for this wide range of positive AOA, owing to the stability of the vortex system over the present cranked-arrow wing with a large inboard sweepback angle of 66deg 1) . The linearity deteriorates for negative AOA probably because the engine nacelles would interfere with the vortex system.…”
Section: Lift and Drag Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Generally, the cranked-arrow wing has good aerodynamic characteristics over a wide range of flight Mach number and angle of attack, because of its stable vortex system. Such aerodynamics have been investigated in detail for wing-fuselage configurations without tails by Rinoie, Kwak, et al [1][2][3][4][5] But those for overall configuration of practical vehicles with tails and control surfaces have not yet been clarified sufficiently. Then the aerodynamic stability and controllability for the proposed baseline configuration are analyzed through wind tunnel tests in this development study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first suction peak at 55% local semi-span indicates the inboard primary vortex, whereas the small suction peak at approximately 70% local semi-span represents the inboard secondary vortex at α = 12.5 • and 15 • . It is induced by the primary vortex and causes the re-separation of the boundary layer [17]. At X = 0.75C r , the suction peak at approximately 85% local semi-span corresponds to the outboard primary vortex at α = 12.5 • , exhibiting the strong negative pressure.…”
Section: Observation Of Span-wise Surface Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…4, the linearity of the lift coefficient is found to be good for a wide range of AOA from -20 to +20 deg. It is probably owing to the stability of the vortex system over the present cranked-arrow wing with a large inboard sweepback angle of 66deg 4) .…”
Section: Longitudinal Aerodynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such aerodynamics have been investigated in detail for wing-fuselage configurations without tails by Rinoie, Kwak, et al [4][5][6][7][8] But those for overall configuration of practical vehicles with tails and control surfaces have not yet been clarified sufficiently. Thus the aerodynamic stability and controllability for the proposed overall configuration with tails and control surfaces are analyzed intensively in this development study.…”
Section: Aerodynamic Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%