2021
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7983
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rolling pits of Hartmann’s mountain zebra (Zebra equus hartmannae) increase vegetation diversity and landscape heterogeneity in the Pre‐Namib

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(120 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Foraging pits and mounds also result from other animal disturbances such as those constructed when animals create shelter (e.g. hip holes and resting forms [16,17]).…”
Section: Soil Disturbance Enhances Biodiversity and Productivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foraging pits and mounds also result from other animal disturbances such as those constructed when animals create shelter (e.g. hip holes and resting forms [16,17]).…”
Section: Soil Disturbance Enhances Biodiversity and Productivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we decided to assign arthropod taxa including species with different feeding behaviour (herbivores, omnivores and predators) to omnivores (cf. 33 ) due to limitations in (taxonomic) knowledge 18 and logistic constrains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the use of those taxonomic levels has been successfully applied studying effects of environmental changes on arthropod communities in arid and semi-arid areas 31 , 32 . In case a taxon consisted of species with either herbivorous, omnivorous and/ or predatory feeding preference, such as beetles or true bugs the group was assigned to omnivores 33 . Ants were considered separately due to their behaviour as predators, scavengers, and indirect herbivores 18 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%