2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rolling shear: Test configurations and properties of some European soft- and hardwood species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
54
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For these boards, the equivalent cross layer shear stiffness modulus lies between 100 and 150 MPa approximately which is twice to three times higher than the local rolling shear stiffness modulus G RT . Hence, the present closed-form bounds confirm previous observations obtained from experiments as well as numerical simulations (Aicher and Dill-Langer, 2000;Jakobs, 2005;Perret et al, 2018;Ehrhart and Brandner, 2018).…”
Section: Equivalent Cross-layer Shear Stiffness Modulus G C Zsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For these boards, the equivalent cross layer shear stiffness modulus lies between 100 and 150 MPa approximately which is twice to three times higher than the local rolling shear stiffness modulus G RT . Hence, the present closed-form bounds confirm previous observations obtained from experiments as well as numerical simulations (Aicher and Dill-Langer, 2000;Jakobs, 2005;Perret et al, 2018;Ehrhart and Brandner, 2018).…”
Section: Equivalent Cross-layer Shear Stiffness Modulus G C Zsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Indeed, because of the stiffness contrast between the longitudinal layers and the cross layers it is possible to argue that the cross layer is mostly sheared by the longitudinal layers (Lebée and Sab, 2012a). Hence in practice the equivalent cross layer shear modulus is mostly determined experimentally from single lap shear tests (Ehrhart et al, 2015;Ehrhart and Brandner, 2018) where narrow edges are free. Following this global picture, a numerical finite elements study is achieved in order to compute an upper bound of the equivalent cross-layer shear stiffness modulus G C Z with glued and free narrow edges.…”
Section: Numerical Upper Bounds For the Cross-layer Shear Stiffness Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, experimental tests and numerical models have also been presented in Franzoni et al [10], in which the influence of large and small gaps between lateral boards (lamellas) on mechanical behavior of CLT panels subjected to vertical loads with respect to its mid-plane has been highlighted, while experimental measurements of rolling shear properties on soft and hardwood species were carried out by Zhou et al [11] and O' Ceallaigh et al [5]. An extensive experimental campaign (consisting of 342 tests), aimed to evaluate the rolling shear properties of six timber species, with three different sawing patterns and three different aspect ratios of specimens, has been conducted by Ehahart and Brandner [12].…”
Section: Rolling Shear Phenomenonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From their tests, they then calculate the shear creep of the cross-layer in order to extend their results to all CLT configurations. Their interpretation is however questionnable as the proper identification of the shear stiffness at layer scale is still under debate because its indirect measurement is extremely sensitive to the accuracy of the bending stiffness estimation in CLT panels [19,20]. Consequently, additional experimental data seems necessary to characterize directly the longitudinal-layer shear creep factor def,0−90 and the cross-layer shear creep factor def,90−90 .…”
Section: On the Influence Of Creepmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the expression of the long term deflections of an imperfect beam ∞ (43) is similar to that of the short term deflection (20) and can be obtained by simply replacing the short term critical load cr,0 by the long term critical load cr,∞ (41). As a consequence, the long term normal strength criterion can be adapted from the short term criterion (27) by replacing the short term buckling load cr,0 by the long term critical load cr,∞ and considering long term elastic characteristics following the same approach :…”
Section: Long Term Buckling Of a Shear Weak Imperfect Columnmentioning
confidence: 99%