2018
DOI: 10.2478/rjim-2018-0012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Romanian Registry of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy – overview of general characteristics and therapeutic choices at a national level

Abstract: The Romanian registry of HCM illustrates patient characteristics at a national level as well as the gaps in management which need improvement - accessibility to high-end diagnostic tests and invasive methods of treatment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current study presents postoperative clinical and echocardiographic data from 83 consecutive patients with HCM and LVOT obstruction who underwent septal myectomy and MV repair in the Cardiomyopathy Center of Bucharest Monza Hospital. Patients’ demographic data were comparable with statistics reported by Romanian Registry of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy [ 9 ] or other cohorts of Romanian patients with HCM [ 10 ], with a mean age falling in the sixth decade of life, and with male predominance. Baseline clinical characteristics and echocardiography findings were similar with those from other European centres [ 11 , 12 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The current study presents postoperative clinical and echocardiographic data from 83 consecutive patients with HCM and LVOT obstruction who underwent septal myectomy and MV repair in the Cardiomyopathy Center of Bucharest Monza Hospital. Patients’ demographic data were comparable with statistics reported by Romanian Registry of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy [ 9 ] or other cohorts of Romanian patients with HCM [ 10 ], with a mean age falling in the sixth decade of life, and with male predominance. Baseline clinical characteristics and echocardiography findings were similar with those from other European centres [ 11 , 12 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The overall demographic profile of our study group was previously documented [37]; the average age at enrollment was approximately in the fifth decade of life, with a higher proportion of male participants, analogous to findings obtained from the Romanian Registry of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy [38]. As showed in Table 1, there were no significant differences between the AFib+ (N = 25) and AFib− (N = 20) groups in terms of age, gender distribution, history of sudden cardiac death (SCD), presence of implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICD), and LV size and function.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The overall demographic pro le of our study group was previously documented [16]; the average age at enrollment was approximately in the fth decade of life, with a higher proportion of male participants, analogous to ndings obtained from the Romanian Registry of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy [22]. As showed in Table 2, there were no signi cant differences between the AFib+ (N = 25) and AFib-(N = 20) groups in terms of age, gender distribution, history of sudden cardiac death (SCD), presence of implantable cardiac de brillators (ICD), and LV size and function.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%