Romantic Physiology and the Work of Romantic Imagination: Hypothesis and Speculation in Science and Coleridge

Sha, Richard C.

doi:10.1080/10509585.2013.807966

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Even if they concern obvious medical practices like anatomy, their point is not usually those practices' effect on bodyminds in the world. For a representative example from European Romantic Review , Richard C. Sha's reading of the Romantics' “physiological understanding of the imagination” touches on nerve science, anatomy, and vitalism to outline a fascinating “aesthetics of embodiment.” This aesthetics is less interested in how physiology or the imagination affects well‐being than in their epistemological implications (Sha, 2013, pp. 405, 416).…”

Section: Romanticism and The Hhmentioning

confidence: 99%

Health humanities and British Romanticism

Pladek

2021

Literature Compass

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article gives an overview of health humanities (HH) scholarship within British Romanticism as a literary historical field. Romantic literary studies has a peculiar relationship to HH work—one that justifies examining it separately from its adjacent fields, 18th‐century and Victorian studies. The article surveys HH work from the past 20 years of Romantic scholarship, drawing some conclusions about how the field's history has informed its current shape, before offering some tentative predictions about the future.

show abstract

Section: Romanticism and The Hhmentioning

confidence: 99%

Health humanities and British Romanticism

Pladek

2021

Literature Compass

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Speculation is too easily associated with science's Others: intuition, mysticism, myth and metaphysics. Science is often opposed to speculation within the institutional contexts in which it operates, like medicine or law (Chapman 1999;Levin 2016;Sha 2013). Theatre has also shown some ambivalence towards speculation for different reasons.…”

Section: Notesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Science in performance

Parry¹

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This series will offer a space for those people who practise theatre to have a dialogue with those who think and write about it. The series has a flexible format that refocuses the analysis and documentation of performance. It provides, presents and represents material which is written by those who make or create performance history, and offers access to theatre documents, different methodologies and approaches to the art of making theatre. The books in the series are aimed at students, scholars, practitioners and theatre-visiting readers. They encourage reassessments of periods, companies and figures in twentieth-century and twentyfirst-century theatre history, and provoke and take up discussions of cultural strategies and legacies that recognise the heterogeneity of performance studies. also available Directing scenes and senses: The thinking of Regie

show abstract

Introduction

Solomonescu¹

2014

John Thelwall and the Materialist Imagination

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Romantic Physiology and the Work of Romantic Imagination: Hypothesis and Speculation in Science and Coleridge

Cited by 3 publications

References 24 publications

Health humanities and British Romanticism

Health humanities and British Romanticism

Science in performance

Introduction

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About