2013
DOI: 10.1121/1.4820895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Room geometry inference based on spherical microphone array eigenbeam processing

Abstract: The knowledge of parameters characterizing an acoustic environment, such as the geometric information about a room, can be used to enhance the performance of several audio applications. In this paper, a novel method for three-dimensional room geometry inference based on robust and high-resolution beamforming techniques for spherical microphone arrays is presented. Unlike other approaches that are based on the measurement and processing of multiple room impulse responses, here, microphone array signal processin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following the design procedure given in Sec. III, the radii of the rings are set to be 0.46, 0.4, 0.34, 0.28, 0.22, 0.16, and 0.1 m. Thus the number of microphone pairs on each ring are 21,19,17,13,11,9, and 7, respectively. To evaluate the performance of the proposed array system, we place a single point source of frequency 150-1150 Hz at ðR; h; /Þ ¼ (1.6 m, 60 , 90 ).…”
Section: A Hypothetical Design Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following the design procedure given in Sec. III, the radii of the rings are set to be 0.46, 0.4, 0.34, 0.28, 0.22, 0.16, and 0.1 m. Thus the number of microphone pairs on each ring are 21,19,17,13,11,9, and 7, respectively. To evaluate the performance of the proposed array system, we place a single point source of frequency 150-1150 Hz at ðR; h; /Þ ¼ (1.6 m, 60 , 90 ).…”
Section: A Hypothetical Design Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,7 The existing spherical arrays can be categorized into two major categories: the open sphere model and the rigid sphere model. Both models are widely used in research applications, such as room geometry inference 13 and near field acoustic holography (NAH). 14 An inherent drawback of the open sphere model is the numerical illconditioning problem, which is due to the nulls in spherical Bessel functions, thus the diameter of the microphone array has to be chosen carefully.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, a large space was required to be sampled, to correctly capture the sound wave. Spherical harmonics were employed in [10,11], to localize reflections. As in [12], they employed continuous signals, however, having issues with low SNRs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rotationally symmetric spatial directivity makes the spherical microphone array an appealing structure in many audio applications, among which the acoustic source localization, or the direction of arrival (DOA) estimation, plays an important role in speech enhancement [1], room impulse response analysis [2], and room geometry inference [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various DOA estimation methods have been proposed, which can be generally classified as beamformer-based [2][3][4][5] and subspace-based [6][7]. The beamformer-based methods, such as those based on plane-wave decomposition (PWD) [4] and the minimum variance distortionless response (MVDR) beamformer [3], have the benefit of straightforward implementation, but suffer from low spatial resolution. The subspace-based methods, such as the multiple signal classification (MUSIC) [6], provide a high spatial resolution; however, they suffer from severe performance degradation when the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is low [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%