Room‐Temperature All‐Solid‐State Lithium–Organic Batteries Based on Sulfide Electrolytes and Organodisulfide Cathodes

Yang, Zihao; Wang, Rui; Hu, Zijun; Chu, Jun; Zhan, Hui; Ai, Xinping; Song, Zhiping

doi:10.1002/aenm.202102962

Cited by 34 publications

(27 citation statements)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…79 The room-temperature all-solid-state lithium batteries (ASSLBs) reported by Yang et al are composed of a poly(trithiocyanuric acid) (PTTCA) cathode and a sulfide electrolyte Li 7 P 3 S 11 . 80 The ASSLBs reported by Ji et al with a PMTH cathode and sulfide electrolyte Li 6 PS 5 Cl deliver a specific capacity of 600 mAh g −1 with a capacity retention of 80.8% after 500 cycles. 81 Molecular organosulfur cathodes also have unique advantages in practical application.…”

Section: Heteroatom-free Organosulfur Moleculesmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…reported the use of Li 6.4 La 3 Zr 1.4 Ta 0.6 O 12 (LLZTO) to block the crossover of LBDT in the catholyte . The room-temperature all-solid-state lithium batteries (ASSLBs) reported by Yang et al are composed of a poly(trithiocyanuric acid) (PTTCA) cathode and a sulfide electrolyte Li 7 P 3 S 11 . The ASSLBs reported by Ji et al with a PMTH cathode and sulfide electrolyte Li 6 PS 5 Cl deliver a specific capacity of 600 mAh g –1 with a capacity retention of 80.8% after 500 cycles …”

Section: Organosulfur As Cathode Materials In Lithium Batteriesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Organosulfur Materials for Rechargeable Batteries: Structure, Mechanism, and Application

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Lithium-ion batteries have received significant attention over the last decades due to the wide application of portable electronics and increasing deployment of electric vehicles. In order to further enhance the performance of the batteries and overcome the capacity limitations of inorganic electrode materials, it is imperative to explore new cathode and functional materials for rechargeable lithium batteries. Organosulfur materials containing sulfur−sulfur bonds as a kind of promising organic electrode materials have the advantages of high capacities, abundant resources, tunable structures, and environmental benignity. In addition, organosulfur materials have been widely used in almost every aspect of rechargeable batteries because of their multiple functionalities. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview on the development of organosulfur materials including the synthesis and application as cathode materials, electrolyte additives, electrolytes, binders, active materials in lithium redox flow batteries, and other metal battery systems. We also give an in-depth analysis of structure−property−performance relationship of organosulfur materials, and guidance for the future development of organosulfur materials for next generation rechargeable lithium batteries and beyond.

show abstract

Section: Heteroatom-free Organosulfur Moleculesmentioning

confidence: 97%

Section: Organosulfur As Cathode Materials In Lithium Batteriesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Organosulfur Materials for Rechargeable Batteries: Structure, Mechanism, and Application

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[155] Additionally, organic CAMs, in which multi-electron transfer reactions occur during (dis-)charging, have been used recently in SSBs. [156][157][158]…”

Section: Conversion-type and In Situ Formed Camsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Designing Cathodes and Cathode Active Materials for Solid‐State Batteries

Minnmann

Strauss

Bielefeld

et al. 2022

Advanced Energy Materials

127

123

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

CAM) in its lithiated form, that is, as present in a discharged cell. In its delithiated form, when the cell is charged, it is the only cell component that is contributing to storing energy (in conjunction with a hypothetical in situ lithiumplated anode formed during charging), thus making it the material required to be present in large quantity to achieve a high-performing cell. All other components, which may be required for large scale processing, only decrease the specific energy of the cell and are, therefore, engineered to minimize their content without affecting the function of the cell. This is evident in the research efforts made to increase the CAM content in the cathode layer, decrease the separator thickness as much as possible, and the pursuit to plate lithium metal in situ (in "anode-free" cells, which are more correctly described as "zero excess lithium metal" cells) without the use of an anode active material. [4] Thus, the CAM type and content in the cell ultimately determine the maximum specific energy that the system can provide.Moreover, the CAM contributes a significant proportion to the overall cell costs, [5] hence the necessity of steady tailoring toward reduced costs and higher energy density. So far, CAM development has mainly targeted performance optimization with LEs in LIBs. For instance, cathode electrolyte interface (CEI) formation, [6] Solid-state batteries (SSBs) currently attract great attention as a potentially safe electrochemical high-energy storage concept. However, several issues still prevent SSBs from outperforming today's lithium-ion batteries based on liquid electrolytes. One major challenge is related to the design of cathode active materials (CAMs) that are compatible with the superionic solid electrolytes (SEs) of interest. This perspective, gives a brief overview of the required properties and possible challenges for inorganic CAMs employed in SSBs, and describes stateof-the art solutions. In particular, the issue of tailoring CAMs is structured into challenges arising on the cathode-, particle-, and interface-level, related to microstructural, (chemo-)mechanical, and (electro-)chemical interplay of CAMs with SEs, and finally guidelines for future CAM development for SSBs are proposed.

show abstract

“…Based on the soft and hard acid/base theory, 328 the hard base O, present in discharged carbonyl groups (C− O − ), readily reacts with the hard acid P, of the sulfide electrolyte, hindering the redox reaction of carbonyl-type active materials. Therefore, Yang et al 329 designed a new organodisulfide cathode material with soft electroactive groups, which showed much better interfacial compatibility with the Li 7 P 3 S 11 electrolyte than carbonyl-type electrodes.…”

Section: Sulfide-based Electrolytesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Electrolytes in Organic Batteries

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Organic batteries using redox-active polymers and small organic compounds have become promising candidates for next-generation energy storage devices due to the abundance, environmental benignity, and diverse nature of organic resources. To date, tremendous research efforts have been devoted to developing advanced organic electrode materials and understanding the material structure–performance correlation in organic batteries. In contrast, less attention was paid to the correlation between electrolyte structure and battery performance, despite the critical roles of electrolytes for the dissolution of organic electrode materials, the formation of the electrode–electrolyte interphase, and the solvation/desolvation of charge carriers. In this review, we discuss the prospects and challenges of organic batteries with an emphasis on electrolytes. The differences between organic and inorganic batteries in terms of electrolyte property requirements and charge storage mechanisms are elucidated. To provide a comprehensive and thorough overview of the electrolyte development in organic batteries, the electrolytes are divided into four categories including organic liquid electrolytes, aqueous electrolytes, inorganic solid electrolytes, and polymer-based electrolytes, to introduce different components, concentrations, additives, and applications in various organic batteries with different charge carriers, interphases, and separators. The perspectives and outlook for the future development of advanced electrolytes are also discussed to provide a guidance for the electrolyte design and optimization in organic batteries. We believe that this review will stimulate an in-depth study of electrolytes and accelerate the commercialization of organic batteries.

show abstract

Room‐Temperature All‐Solid‐State Lithium–Organic Batteries Based on Sulfide Electrolytes and Organodisulfide Cathodes

Cited by 34 publications

References 38 publications

Organosulfur Materials for Rechargeable Batteries: Structure, Mechanism, and Application

Organosulfur Materials for Rechargeable Batteries: Structure, Mechanism, and Application

Designing Cathodes and Cathode Active Materials for Solid‐State Batteries

Electrolytes in Organic Batteries

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About