1993
DOI: 10.1143/jjap.32.l1000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Room-Temperature Low-Threshold Surface-Stimulated Emission by Optical Pumping from Al0.1Ga0.9N/GaN Double Heterostructure

Abstract: The difference in the refractive index at around λ=0.37 µm between GaN and Al0.1Ga0.9N is found to be about 0.19. With use of AlGaN/GaN double heterostructures, the threshold power for surface-stimulated emission by optical pumping at room temperature has been markedly decreased to about one-twentieth that of a bulk GaN layer. The mechanism of the stimulated emission in this system is discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The expected increase of the index of refraction with increasing photon energy towards the bandgap, and the overall decrease with Al content, is observed for the whole series of samples. The dependence of refractive index on energy obtained for the GaN and the Al 0.1 Ga 0.9 N samples is in excellent agreement with the results of Amano et al [19], [20] and Vidal et al [21]. For 0.7 < x < 1 there is a tendency for the experimentally determined refractive indexes to be too low, most probably due to a decrease of the effective film density compared to an ideal crystal.…”
Section: Index Of Refractionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The expected increase of the index of refraction with increasing photon energy towards the bandgap, and the overall decrease with Al content, is observed for the whole series of samples. The dependence of refractive index on energy obtained for the GaN and the Al 0.1 Ga 0.9 N samples is in excellent agreement with the results of Amano et al [19], [20] and Vidal et al [21]. For 0.7 < x < 1 there is a tendency for the experimentally determined refractive indexes to be too low, most probably due to a decrease of the effective film density compared to an ideal crystal.…”
Section: Index Of Refractionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Refractive indices of AlN and GaN were also determined, by the same technique, to be 2.46 and 2.72 at 250 nm and 370 nm, respectively, where the refractive index of the 6H-SiC substrate was assumed to be 3.28 at 250 nm and 2.81 at 370 nm [17]. These values are very close to those in previous reports [18,19]. Experimental results indicate that the refractive indices of BAlN and BGaN strongly depend on the boron content and change drastically by introducing a small amount of boron.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…when the photon energy is smaller than the band gap of AlGaN, interference oscillation in the thick GaN layer is seen for both samples. At around 312 nm, a peak from the thin AlGaN layer is seen [3], and sample B shows a higher peak than sample A. The spectra did not change upon annealing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%