Introduction
Endodontic diagnostic tests are often used clinically to assess pulp status as a basis for diagnosis and determination of whether root canal treatment (RCT) is indicated. Response to cold and pain on percussion are two common tests, yet their validity in identifying non-vital pulp in regular dental practice has not been reported.
Methods
We assessed the validity of cold and percussion tests to identify non-vital pulp in teeth requiring RCT in a dental practice setting, performed by 46 general dentists and 16 endodontists in the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network. The influence of patient-, tooth- and dentist-related characteristics was investigated. Observed bleeding from the pulp chamber was the clinical reference. Sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), overall test accuracy (TA), positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values, and likelihood and diagnostic odds ratios (LR+, LR−, dOR) were calculated for each single test and the combined cold and percussion tests.
Results
708 patient-teeth were included. Cold test showed high validity to identify a non-vital pulp status (SN 89%, SP 80%, TA 84%, PPV 81%, NPV 88%, LR+ 4.35, LR− 0.14, dOR 31.4), while pain on percussion had lower validity (SN 72%, SP 41%, TA 56%, PPV 54%, NPV 60%, LR+ 1.22, LR− 0.69, dOR 1.78). Combining the two tests did not increase validity, while preoperative pain, medication intake, patient age and gender, and dentist training level affected test validity significantly.
Conclusion
In regular dental practice, cold test exhibits higher validity to discriminate between vital and non-vital pulp than does tooth percussion test.