TENCON 2011 - 2011 IEEE Region 10 Conference 2011
DOI: 10.1109/tencon.2011.6129142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Root cause detection of Call drops in live GSM network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of ANN for the development of the model in this work has the advantage of training any network and prediction as long as correct data were supplied. The paper described a good approach for call drops detection as in [11]- [15] by using different scenarios. It has been demonstrated that a classification of call drop events can be made with this approach based on five GSM parameters, namely RxLev, RxQual, FER, BER and TA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The use of ANN for the development of the model in this work has the advantage of training any network and prediction as long as correct data were supplied. The paper described a good approach for call drops detection as in [11]- [15] by using different scenarios. It has been demonstrated that a classification of call drop events can be made with this approach based on five GSM parameters, namely RxLev, RxQual, FER, BER and TA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These predictions were based on acquired data from servers that had recorded dropped call events over periods of time. Another researcher collected the TCH (traffic channel) call drop events from a live GSM network and used ANN to predict the probability of drop call [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In literature, different attempts have been adopted to examine and model the rate of call drops in cellular mobile networks, but mostly through theoretical and analytical methods [5]- [14], which are too complex and impracticable to explore during network planning/re-planning phase [15][16][17][18][19]. In [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29], the authors engaged combined theoretical survey and analytical methods to study wireless network performance using some key performance indicators such as signal quality [20,21], blocking/dropping probabilities in [22][23][24][25], grade of service in [26], traffic delay in [27], outage probability in [28], spectral efficiency in [29], and cell availability in [30], respectively.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When there is no direct line of sight between the sending and receiving antennas, the Rayleigh effect occurs because of the rapid change in the received signal level, both in terms of amplitude and phase. Chandler (2020) Existence of weak coverage area and weak radio signal, intra-network interference, unreasonable radio parameter settings, equipment hardware faults such as low output power of the power amplifier, large differences among different carrier transmission, power, carrier transmitter fault, combiner fault, and splitter fault, faults in antenna feeder system, and weak battery power, are all reported as causes of radio link failure call drop existence of interference such as intranetwork interference due to unreasonable frequency planning and other external interference, equipment hardware fault, such as clock fault in destination cell or in source cell, low output power of the power amplifier, large difference among different transmitter's transmission power, transmitter fault, combiner fault, and divider fault, and unreasonable radio parameter settings, are the causes of handover failure call drop according to Sudhindra and Sridhar (2011).…”
Section: Causes Of Call-drop In Mobile Cellular Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%