2019
DOI: 10.1186/s12903-019-0849-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Root coverage using a connective tissue graft with epithelial striation in combination with enamel matrix derivatives - a long-term retrospective clinical interventional study

Abstract: Background The application of a connective tissue graft with epithelial striation (CTG-ES) has been shown to improve the outcome of root coverage (RC) using the coronally advanced flap (CAF) and adjunctive administration of enamel matrix derivatives (EMD). Aim of the present study was to evaluate the long-term (mean: 16.19 ± 1.80 years, range: 13 to 18 years) stability of this treatment method with special focus on the location of the gingival margin and the width of keratinized tissue (WKT). … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comprehensive reviews between these techniques clearly indicated that there were no significant differences in efficacy and reported results show a high variability because of selection of defects, magnitude of defects, location of recession, mean initial depth and operator skill. [23][24][25][26][27] Our study showed statistically significant reduction of gingival recession, with concomitant attachment gain, following treatment with all tested surgical techniques which is supported by other authors [25][26][27]. Both surgical techniques showed the highest percentage gain in coverage of recession depth as well as gain in keratinized gingiva.…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comprehensive reviews between these techniques clearly indicated that there were no significant differences in efficacy and reported results show a high variability because of selection of defects, magnitude of defects, location of recession, mean initial depth and operator skill. [23][24][25][26][27] Our study showed statistically significant reduction of gingival recession, with concomitant attachment gain, following treatment with all tested surgical techniques which is supported by other authors [25][26][27]. Both surgical techniques showed the highest percentage gain in coverage of recession depth as well as gain in keratinized gingiva.…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
“…Although many comparisons have been made using different surgical approaches, of both coronally advanced flap and the subepithelial connective tissue graft techniques for root coverage [19][20][21][22][23]. In the literature lacks studies that directly compare these and other techniques.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these led us to making a trial treatment, thus, avoiding invasive examination. The weakness of our management is that the patient cannot complete the periodontal treatment, although connective tissue grafting to improve root coverage can be expected 10,11 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It provides better position and stability and augments healing process. [ 8 ] Recently, a subperiosteal peri-implant-augmented layer technique has been reported for coverage of minor peri-implant bone dehiscence. [ 9 ] In the present case, the area of exposure was relatively large, and the underlying bone was a block graft undergoing integration with the recipient site making employment of such techniques difficult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%