2019
DOI: 10.1111/iej.13208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Root dentinal microcracks: a post‐extraction experimental phenomenon?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
48
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Literature suggests some of the in vitro conditions in which several studies were performed as a possible reason for the formation of microcracks: stresses exerted during extraction (either traumatic or atraumatic extraction techniques) [ 56 , 57 ], possible tooth dehydration, inappropriate storage and careless handling of the extracted teeth, as well as absence of periodontal support [ 27 , 29 ]. Therefore, in the present ex vivo study we could have obtained an overestimation of microcracks, despite all the efforts that have been made to prevent it—only freshly extracted teeth were included and specimens were kept moist throughout the experimental procedures, along with the use of silicon blocks to minimize the concern of the absence of periodontal ligament and stabilize the teeth during instrumentation procedures, although in Gondim et al [ 58 ], the use of stabilization methods did not prevent the appearance of fractures after root-end preparation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature suggests some of the in vitro conditions in which several studies were performed as a possible reason for the formation of microcracks: stresses exerted during extraction (either traumatic or atraumatic extraction techniques) [ 56 , 57 ], possible tooth dehydration, inappropriate storage and careless handling of the extracted teeth, as well as absence of periodontal support [ 27 , 29 ]. Therefore, in the present ex vivo study we could have obtained an overestimation of microcracks, despite all the efforts that have been made to prevent it—only freshly extracted teeth were included and specimens were kept moist throughout the experimental procedures, along with the use of silicon blocks to minimize the concern of the absence of periodontal ligament and stabilize the teeth during instrumentation procedures, although in Gondim et al [ 58 ], the use of stabilization methods did not prevent the appearance of fractures after root-end preparation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The microcracks observed post‐extraction were not present pre‐extraction. They therefore concluded that microcracks observed are due to the extraction process and the storage condition . This might explain why other studies have shown that dehydrated dentin has a lower fracture resistance than hydrated dentin …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…It was shown that the restorative status and tooth age are important variables . It was also suggested that microcracks seen in teeth from tooth banks may be due to the extraction process and the storage conditions . Dentin dehydration is another factor known to decrease fracture resistance .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, in preparation of mandibular teeth cadavers, De Deus et al 33 observed pre-existing microcracks. More recently, another study by De Deus et al 34 also aimed to investigate the occurrence of preexisting dentinal defects in non-endodontically treated teeth in fresh cadavers. It was suggested that pre-existing dental defects are treated are experimental and formed by storage conditions and/or due to extraction procedures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%