1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf00029324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Root distribution in a Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) stand subjected to drought and ammonium-sulphate application

Abstract: Results of the spatial distribution of fine roots are reported from a Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) in SW Sweden stand subjected to drought (D) and ammonium-sulphate application (NS). The sampling was carried out by excavating monoliths in segments of 0.5 × 0.5 × 0.1 m to a depth of one meter. Root data also included in the study were obtained by excavating whole trees and soil coring.The data suggest a fairly deep distribution pattern of fine roots (< 1 mm in diameter) in the study area compared wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clearly, our fine root inventory covers only the topsoil and we hence may have missed preferential biomass partitioning to other parts of the root system. Trees growing at drier sites could allocate more carbon to root growth in deeper soil layers to access the moister subsoil and escape surface drying [70,71]. However, a meta-analysis of root biomass data by Schenk and Jackson [72] and a detailed study of the subsoil root system of Fagus sylvatica along a precipitation gradient by Meier et al [68] showed the opposite response to long-term precipitation reduction, i.e., shallower rooting of trees under water limitation.…”
Section: Fine Root Biomass and Belowground C Allocation In Dependencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, our fine root inventory covers only the topsoil and we hence may have missed preferential biomass partitioning to other parts of the root system. Trees growing at drier sites could allocate more carbon to root growth in deeper soil layers to access the moister subsoil and escape surface drying [70,71]. However, a meta-analysis of root biomass data by Schenk and Jackson [72] and a detailed study of the subsoil root system of Fagus sylvatica along a precipitation gradient by Meier et al [68] showed the opposite response to long-term precipitation reduction, i.e., shallower rooting of trees under water limitation.…”
Section: Fine Root Biomass and Belowground C Allocation In Dependencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…or because more than one reference supplied duplicate information for the same site. Relevant studies by biome were: boreal forest (27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32), deserts (33)(34)(35)(36)(37), sclerophyllous shrublands and forests (38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45), temperate coniferous forest (46)(47)(48)(49)(50)(51)(52)(53)(54)(55)(56), temperate deciduous forest (46,47,49,50,52,(57)(58)(59)(60)(61)(62)(63)(64)(65)(66)(67), temperate grasslands (36,(68)(69)(70)…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil moisture and irrigation/drought experiments accomplished with other species than Norway spruce, such as Scots pine, are largely not comparable as their physiological resilience against high/low soil moisture content among species is so different. A few months of experimental drought in a Norway spruce stand in SW Sweden led to no statistical differences in fine root biomass between the drought and control treatments, even though in the drought treatment the fine root biomass in the surface litter was lower than in the control treatment (Persson et al 1995). This rather superficial effect was caused by the fine root response to extend deeper in the soil where more water was available.…”
Section: Moisturementioning
confidence: 84%