Root-end filling materials - review

Borisova-Papancheva, Tsvetelina; Panov, Vladimir; Peev, Stefan; Papanchev, Georgi

doi:10.14748/.v1i1.622

Cited by 5 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“… 12 Many authors advise sealing the root‐end cavity after an apicoectomy. 14 , 15 , 16 Although the root‐end filling stops microleakage, additional skills are needed. The time and materials required to prepare the retrograde cavity and produce the retrofill must also be taken into account.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Surgical endodontic treatment of maxillary incisors: Case report

Almansour

2023

Clinical Case Reports

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Cone‐beam computed tomography aids in outcome prediction and obviates issues 12 . Many authors advise sealing the root‐end cavity after an apicoectomy 14–16 . Although the root‐end filling stops microleakage, additional skills are needed.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Surgical endodontic treatment of maxillary incisors: Case report

Almansour

2023

Clinical Case Reports

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…-MTA It is a refined hydrophilic powder derived from Portland cement (a basic component of concrete used in the construction industry) [6]. The main molecules present in MTA are calcium and phosphorus ions, derived mainly from tricalcium silicate, tricalcium aluminate, tricalcium oxide, and silicate oxide [7]. Bismuth is a heavy metal and is added to cement in the form of bismuth oxide (Bi 2 O 3 ) in a ratio of 4:1 to provide radiopacity to the MTA for radiological diagnosis.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of the Retrograde Filling Material on the Success of Periapical Surgery. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by Groups

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Periapical surgery is a procedure indicated for the treatment of persistent apical periodontitis in an endodontically treated tooth and when retreatment has not been successful or not feasible. Various materials have been suggested and tested for this purpose: amalgam, MTA, and zinc-eugenol oxide cements, among others. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the results regarding the success of the periapical surgery and if the retrograde filling material used influences this success rate. A systematic review of the literature on the prognosis of periapical surgery was performed. The following PICO question was asked: “In patients who require periapical surgery (patient), is the retrograde filling (comparison) material used in apicoectomy (intervention) determining for the success of the treatment (outcome)?” Periapical surgery achieves successful results in 84% of cases. All the materials compared obtain satisfactory results. The results of the meta-analysis show that there are no statistically significant differences between MTA compared to SuperEBA (1.37 (95% CI: 0.87, 2.15)) or RRM (0.99 (95% CI: 0.51, 1.94)) but with MRI (1.93 (95% CI: 1.22, 3.05)), where the results favour MTA. In general, the most modern materials obtain better results than amalgam. Surgical techniques with magnification obtain better results (12.3% failure) than conventional techniques (22.93% failure). Periapical surgery is a procedure with a high success rate. The use of all the materials compared obtains satisfactory results. Magnification surgery techniques perform better than conventional techniques.

show abstract

“…Cone-beam computed tomography helps to predict the results and avoid complications (5). Most of the authors recommend performing a root-end cavity filling after apicoectomy (8,9,10). The root-end filling avoids the microleakage but additional skills are also necessary, time and resources to prepare retrograde cavity and to make a retrofill should also be taken into consideration.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Posterior Endodontic Surgery – A Case Report

Borisova-Papancheva¹,

Papanchev²,

Peev³

et al. 2016

MedInform

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: Endodontic surgery is a standard procedure which enhances the retention* survival rate of many teeth which can not be treated only endodontically (inaccessibility to the apical part of the root by a coronal approach due to posts, root fractures, separated instruments in root canals, calcified and tortuous root canals, dens in dente, , etc.). Endodontic surgery can be applied both to the anterior and posterior regions on the maxilla and mandibula . In posterior regions the surgical procedure is more difficult due to anatomical conditions (maxillary sinus, mandibular canal, number of root canals, inaccessible posterior oral cavity, etc). Aim: To present a difficult clinical case where endodontic surgery was chosen as the most -convenient method for treatment because by the routine endodontic treatment is not possible to remove a separated instrument in the periapical lesion. Methods: The endodontic treatment was performed on tooth #36, followed by endodontic obturation of the root canal system. In two days an apicoectomy without retrograde filling was performed. Results: One year after the apicoectomy there is complete healing of the periapical lesion with new bone formation and no symptoms in the patient.

show abstract

Root-end filling materials - review

Cited by 5 publications

References 41 publications

Surgical endodontic treatment of maxillary incisors: Case report

Surgical endodontic treatment of maxillary incisors: Case report

Influence of the Retrograde Filling Material on the Success of Periapical Surgery. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by Groups

Posterior Endodontic Surgery – A Case Report

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About