2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-020-03365-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Root-end microsurgery using a premixed tricalcium silicate putty as root-end filling material: a prospective study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of calcium phosphate improves the setting properties of these materials, establishing a crystalline structure comparable with the tooth and bone apatite [ 50 ]. This type of material presents putty consistency and faster setting time, becoming easier to handle and deliver to the operative site [ 51 ]. However, the scientific evidence that supports its clinical use as a root-end filling material remains scarce.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of calcium phosphate improves the setting properties of these materials, establishing a crystalline structure comparable with the tooth and bone apatite [ 50 ]. This type of material presents putty consistency and faster setting time, becoming easier to handle and deliver to the operative site [ 51 ]. However, the scientific evidence that supports its clinical use as a root-end filling material remains scarce.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The introduction of the dental operative microscope (DOM) in the early 1990s led to a new era in modern microsurgical endodontics [9]. Besides magnification, contemporary techniques incorporate the use of ultrasonic tips, microsurgical instruments and filling materials which exhibit superior biocompatibility such as mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), Biodentine [7,[10][11][12][13], and premixed tricalcium silicate putty (TotalFill FS putty) [14]. This new microsurgical approach allowed for a significant improvement in success rates, reaching levels above 91% [7,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The titles and abstracts of the 113 selected articles were screened and 79 articles were excluded. Then, the remaining 34 articles were subjected to full-text analysis to assess eligibility, with 21 articles being excluded [ 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 ] according to the reasons listed in Table S2 . Therefore, 13 articles were included in the qualitative assessment: one randomized controlled trial [ 8 ], four prospective cohort studies [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 51 ], and eight retrospective cohort studies [ 9 , 10 , 11 , 17 , 26 , 52 , 53 , 54 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%